Browns who have scored over 40 TWICE this season. Braylon Edwards contributed to that so he should get some mention as well. After week 1 I thought the Browns would be
0-6 by now. I kinda feel bad for Charlie Frye because it looks like it's all his fault, but not so bad that I'm not enjoying the .500 record! The other feats are very impressive, but not really surprising.
2007-10-17 07:46:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
No brainer. #1.
2. 19 yards per reception is good, but that number is easily skewed for a WR since a lot depends on routes run and # of catches. It is impressive, but since receptions are so much fewer than RB carries, it doesn' t say a ton.
3. QB rating isn't a great stat. A rating can be high without a QB contributing a lot. While the number is nice, as is zero picks, a QB who is asked to throw 2-3 TDs a game and does so is more valuable than a QB who is just asked not to make a mistake, as Garrard is.
4. No kicker stat is that impressive. Even if they were, he only has 3 attempts. Once he goes 20-20, then it may be something.
5. The Browns offense is much improved, but they are still only 3-3. Plus one of those games was against Cincy, who allows just about everyone to score at will most weeks.
#1. Peterson is an absolute beast. He averages that number despite getting a good share of carries. For a feature back to average over 5.0 yards a carry is very impressive. 6.3 is insane for the NFL, and keep in mind he's just a rookie and in an offense that literally can't throw the football.
2007-10-17 07:53:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by h_charles 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
I'd go with Peterson's 6.3 per carry, since it's much rarer than the other feats you've listed.
To put it in context, the great Barry Sanders averaged 6.1 yards in his 2,000-yard season, which was the highest number seen in almost three decades. To be up in that kind of company is amazing.
Do I think he can keep it up all season? Probably not, but he's as good a rookie back as I've seen.
2007-10-17 07:47:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Craig S 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
1 and 2 are good.
3? Thats not even close to leading the league, why is that impressive and the three quarterbacks ahead of him not?
4. That is impressive, but its early in the season so I'd hold off on being too impressed.
5. Whats not impressive about the array of teams that are better than 3-3?
I'd have to say 1 is the most impressive.
2007-10-17 08:04:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
1. that is to be expected
2. i knew he had to potential to do this.
3.who is david garrard?
4.Kris brown is a good kicker
5. the cleveland browns are my surprise of the year, with a good QB in anderson, a good o-line, and a good RB in jamal lewis, they have the opportunity to actually make it into the playoffs this year, which was something that i would have never thought i would say, especially about the cleveland browns.
2007-10-17 07:49:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by kevin_ramsey2002 1
·
1⤊
2⤋
1. Adrian Peterson's 6.3 yards per carry.
2007-10-17 07:44:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Garrard
2007-10-17 07:49:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by rikirailrd 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
no longer with the stunt. i'm inspired that someone so obviously stupid can get with some chicks like that. i'm also inspired that you've a lot time on your fingers that you no longer in basic terms found that video, although that is mandatory to sense out others' evaluations on it. that is obviously time so that you may expose off the computing gadget.
2016-10-21 07:50:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Peterson because he also averaging 17.5 yards per catch out of the backfield! That is just sick. I have NEVER heard of such a thing.
2007-10-17 08:13:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
adrian peterson...he is rookie putting those numbers up on a team that is lacking in almost every other catagory....its really incredible
2007-10-17 07:44:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by game_rooster 5
·
1⤊
1⤋