One is not a prime number
In most cases it doesn't really matter whether it counts as a prime or not, so many people who have only done relatively basic math think it is, and they have never needed to be corrected.
However in a number of situations it does matter - and people who have done maths to this advanced level will have learned that one is not a prime number.
I found this page which sets out a number of these reasons.
2007-10-17 07:22:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by P P 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
In mathematics, a prime number (or a prime) is a natural number which has exactly two distinct natural number divisors: 1 and itself. An infinitude of prime numbers exists, as demonstrated by Euclid in about 300 BC. The first thirty prime numbers are:
2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, 59, 61, 67, 71, 73, 79, 83, 89, 97, 101, 103, 107, 109, 113
2007-10-17 07:11:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Radiator 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
NO The first thirty prime numbers are:
2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, 59, 61, 67, 71, 73, 79, 83, 89, 97, 101, 103, 107, 109, 113
2007-10-17 07:14:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ti-2000 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
from most prime number definition..'In mathematics, a prime number is a natural number which has exactly two distinct natural number divisors: 1 and itself'
and example of natural numbers (1,2,3,4,5........)
from the above definitions, then 1 is not a prime number because it does not have two distinct natural number divisors.
the key word here is 'two distinct ..divisor' although some believe it is a prime number as it have two divisor 1 and itself which is also 1. but that goes against the definition.
have a nice day (it is a prime number.....)
2007-10-17 21:26:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by wunti 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
A prime number is a number which can only be divided by itself and 1,
and because in the case of 1, itself and 1 are the same thing, technically it is not a prime number.
So, 2 is the first prime number.
2007-10-17 07:11:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Mathematicians want to be able to factor any positive integer into powers of postive prime numbers uniquely. For example, 12 is uniquely factorized into 2^2 * 3, and 3,528 is uniquely factorized into 2^3 * 3^2 * 7^2. Now, if we say that 1 is a prime number, then we'd have 12 = 1^a * 2^2 * 3, and 3,528 = 1^b * 2^3 * 3^2 * 7^2, where a and b are any positive integer, which means such factorization is not unique. That's why by convention 1 is not called a prime number.
Addendum: Thanks P P, for citing a paper that supports what I said.
2007-10-17 07:18:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Scythian1950 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
No, because a prime number has two factors: 1, and itself. But for this number, it only has one factor: 1.
Two IS a prime number, since it has 2 factors, 1 and 2. Hope this helps!
2007-10-17 07:06:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Funky Little Spacegirl 6
·
6⤊
1⤋
No. The defn of a prime number is one that has TWO factors which are integers. These factors are 1 and itself. 1 only has one factor and that is 1.
2007-10-17 12:04:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by mr_maths_man 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
1 is not a prime number beacuse prime numbers are natural numbers greater than 1 whose only divisors among the natural numbers are 1 and themselves
2007-10-17 17:33:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by basil 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, it has 2 factors, although the second is not widely recognises. There is of course 1. But also there is 0.
Let me explain. 5^0=1 8^0=1 2,543,722^0=1.
Anything to the power of 0 is 1. Therefore 0^0=1, making 0 a factor of 1, therefore giving it 2 factors. This is a grey area in maths, but it does work.
2007-10-17 07:21:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by shadow.stalke 2
·
0⤊
1⤋