http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071017/ap_on_re_mi_ea/turkey
2007-10-17 06:49:44 · 21 answers · asked by Darth Vader 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He obviously wouldn't want them to but he has little say in the matter........
2007-10-17 06:53:10 · answer #1 · answered by Brian 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I only exceeded off to be channel surfing at some point this previous summer season, as quickly as I exceeded off upon Bush's impeachment hearings on CSPN. What they have been discussing... Our government knew as reality that the final of Iraq's WMD's have been desroyed in 1997. The 'cellular chemical trucks' that our information confirmed us to be cellular organic and organic weapons labs have been additionally everyday at that element to be climate forcasting equipment. i don't be attentive to why this all only went away, as Bush is accountable, and shown so by skill of knowledge. that's no longer a conflict approximately 'terrorism', except you talk approximately us the terrorists...800,000-a million,200,000 ineffective Iraqi's do. that's all with regard to the worldwide economic company/Federal Reserve enjoying Monopoly, and putting togeather the products mandatory to enact the recent worldwide Order. CFR member Obama will proceed this legacy, because of the fact the CFR schedule trumps usa's pastimes. Iran is next.
2016-10-12 23:21:44 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we have understood the situation in Middle East and had not gone in to support the so called freedom fighters of PKK (Kurdish Terrorist Organization). We would not be in the mess we are.
We went in to protect the KLA Kosovo Liberation Army, in Serbia, and today we are still there.
We oppose Russia in Chechnya.
When will we learn not to support the so called freedom fighters and their agenda? And putting them on same pedestal as the American Revolutionaries.
All these small band Freedom Fighters are extended arm of Al Qaeda and they have played US well in to supporting their cause.
After the defeat of Saddam Kurds were allowed complete freedom over the territories they occupied, they were given equal rights in the Iraqi Parliament, What do they do, instead of building a stable Kurdish Ruled region with US support they begin attacking Turkey with the weapons provided by US, tomorrow this situation will come to bite us again.
KLA is now attacking Macedonia for greater share of that land for Albanians again claiming Macedonia oppression and calling themselves Freedom Fighters.
USA and its Mid-east analyst are stuck in Israel and Palestine situation mode and they do not understand the fact that all Islamic Freedom fighters want is to convert the entire planet in to submission to Islam. Slowly they are succeeding and we are helping them succeed.
Let us also not forget the Kashmir India situation where we have been supporting the biggest terrorist state of Pakistan for last 60 years.
2007-10-17 06:54:48 · answer #3 · answered by Thomas B 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why is that stupid? Turkey is being hit by Kurdish Terrorist attacks from within Iraq, and the Iraqi government hasn't made any moves to stop them.
How on earth could President Bush possibly look himself in the mirror if he didn't allow our allies to protect themselves from terrorists?
2007-10-17 07:02:14 · answer #4 · answered by Beardog 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't think GW has much to say about it, the Turks are nuts enuff to do it without his approval. I'd be more concerned with the question: Is Bush stoopid enuff to invade Iran?
2007-10-17 06:55:22 · answer #5 · answered by paddy0159 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
This is a bigger issue than people think. One of the reasons the US army is in Iraq is to guarantee it's borders.
Are we obligated to repel the Turkish army?
2007-10-17 08:47:28 · answer #6 · answered by mjmayer188 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You libs are always talking about how we overstep our bounds in telling other countries what to do...how can Bush STOP Turkey if that sovereign nation decides to invade?
2007-10-17 06:52:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Pelosi wants to block the Iraq- Turkey border crossing for our troops.
2007-10-17 06:52:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
Knowing W he will have a signing statement that forbidding it , but reality he has no control over the Turkish government
2007-10-17 07:29:20 · answer #9 · answered by jean 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
probably this is his solution, we pull out let other countries deal with securing Iraq, and whatever happens we can't get the blame. this is just getting worse and worse. now we have to worry about Iran too and hillary either, according to her, will get the troops out her first term as said in the dem debate or in other interviews can't promise to bring them home her first term because she doesn't know what she'll be inheriting.
2007-10-17 06:54:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
You need to either restate your question or re-read the news item. The president is not in any way supporting the invasion of the Kurds.
2007-10-17 06:54:23 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋