2007-10-17 05:55:41 · 13 answers · asked by slightlystoutbob 2 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ Other - Football
i also think if they'd only played better football than russia they would have deserved to win as well.
2007-10-17 13:52:01 · answer #1 · answered by falgee 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
well considering that the score was 2-1 to russia i think that if england had scored 2 more goals they would of won;)
whoever asked that question your a genius!
2007-10-17 06:07:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Generally, the team with the most goals at the end of the game wins. Good observation.
2007-10-17 05:58:29 · answer #3 · answered by lockthedeadbolt 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
maybe if the ref hadnt of given a penalty when it was clearly a free kick outside the box. they wouldnt have scored 2.
2007-10-17 06:46:26 · answer #4 · answered by Paul S 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It the same old story every time it's an important England match - we just can't deliver when it matters.
2007-10-17 05:58:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep. Sounds like Rooney's analysis.
2007-10-17 05:58:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
We only needed 2 hours injury time and I think we might have got them
2007-10-17 06:00:13 · answer #7 · answered by Lewisthelab 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Don't tell us the result, we are waiting for Match of the Day at 10.40pm on BBC.
2007-10-17 05:57:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thats not John Motson is it?
2007-10-17 06:00:29 · answer #9 · answered by First Ascent 4 Thistle 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There goes one pig flying overhead, wait for it.......there's another.
2007-10-17 05:58:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋