we waisted a few more billion in invading Iran or invested those billions in protecting our borders and in defensive eforts instead of offensive ones... or are we just ignorant and see defensive eforts as a waist of $, but war is not?
2007-10-17 04:59:18 · 12 answers · asked by Looking for the REAL answer! 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
who says we would fight on our borders???? I'm saying protect them and innialate anything or anyone trying to come in and harm us… and playing some defense instead of going in with the offense all the time
2007-10-17 05:06:52 · update #1
god I hate it when people nit pick typos who freakin cares just answer the question
2007-10-17 05:08:10 · update #2
crosseyed pea , how can you say that, money is no object when it comes to our safety, i understand where u people are comming from, but we can just keep printing money to fund this ridiculous war, people dont see its not about protecting us, yea thats what they tell us, thats the title it has, but not the reasoning behind it, u really think they would waste Billions of dollars a day for ur safety , that is realy nieve, hell no its a business over there,a multi billion dollar business. Your safety is the least of there concerns, money first , safety second, most people here would prob bash mesaying im not patriotic, but people dont like to hear somethign that would make them think for a second,cause it sounds ridicoulous and un patriotic. so thats my 2 cents go ahead and gimme those a thumbs down for this one "republicans" "Democrats" as well anyone for this stupid war on Oil, money, power ,
2007-10-17 05:27:35 · answer #1 · answered by ATN L 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Both are important for America's and our allies' security and we should invest in both. NOT a plethora of social programs the Federal Government has no business spending our tax money on.
.
2007-10-17 05:10:23 · answer #2 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
We need to close our borders,but congress thinks differently.
We haven't invaded Iran and are trying diplomacy thru the UN and other sources,trouble is they are not willing to listen.
They are going to build a bomb and test it in Isreal.
That will have serious repercussions .
2007-10-17 05:10:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
understanding that i've got given each little thing in my life over to the author of the universe, who despatched his son to die for my sins. No greater advantageous love can exist, so why would not i've got faith risk-free.
2016-12-18 09:57:53 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The best defense is a good offense. If we kill the terrorists now in their homes we dont have to worry about our borders.
2007-10-17 05:09:15 · answer #5 · answered by Tom K 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
NO MORE WAR!
How about just not allowing immigrants to learn how to fly planes? Or cracking down on the Muslim religion in the U.S. since it seems they are the only ones against "the West"?
Profiling is very important now-a-days. If you are against it, you must be a freedom hater.
2007-10-17 05:04:32 · answer #6 · answered by HERE WE GO BROWNIES, BEAT PIT!! 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
It is "waste", not "waist", and "efforts", not "eforts".
With that said, I take issue with your charge of waste. You set forth 2 options. I do not see them as mutually exclusive.
2007-10-17 05:05:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Charity begans at home so lets spend money on Just Americans
2007-10-17 05:06:09 · answer #8 · answered by Gypsy Gal 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Bring out troops home and let them defend the border.
2007-10-17 05:05:46 · answer #9 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
I'd rather fight our battles in the Middle East than at our boarders
2007-10-17 05:04:13 · answer #10 · answered by Johnny 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋