2007-10-17 04:45:54 · 39 answers · asked by ziggy89015 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
DIMMEST ANSWER goes to caretaker about 30 answers down.
2007-10-17 04:56:26 · update #1
NO WAY! Let her earn her own cash.
2007-10-17 04:49:17 · answer #1 · answered by Marilyn T 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Actually $25 million may be a bit low considering she must live a lifestyle that protects his children from harm. A child of a Beetle is a prime target for nutcases and kidnappers. Protection is not cheap and the family requires 24 hour security.
2007-10-17 04:56:35 · answer #2 · answered by The Q 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Honestly no,I mean you have a relationship with someone and things don't go well so you end up splitting up and although you end up sharing things together and having a child,I don't think it's right to have to take his money like that which he has built up,although I do think he should contribute towards the child's welfare I don't think ti should have to be payed out like that.
2007-10-17 05:07:07 · answer #3 · answered by Classy Clarissa 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i though she was offered 50 million.... either way she is just a gold digger and paul is well rid. nobody deserves that much just because they were married to someone famous, but on the other hand paul must of known that she could claim half of his money if they divored .
2007-10-17 04:57:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I believe the price should be 1 million per year they were married. This is far more reasonable.
Can you imagine how much that would affect celebrity marriages if that became the standard rate?
2007-10-17 04:48:58 · answer #5 · answered by loryntoo 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes! She deserves more if we will only talk about the nerve that she has shown about this case. Other than that, not even a crumb of bread.
2007-10-17 04:59:36 · answer #6 · answered by Not me 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She doesn't deserve 25 cents! He married her out of pity and look what she did to him. If I were him I'd ask for the 6 legs he bought her back! LOL!
2007-10-17 04:48:19 · answer #7 · answered by Kwe' 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
she deserves only what she put into it and brought to it . everyone knows what she was marrying him for in the beginning . there's no fool like an old fool . she was nothing more than a gold digger and having a baby meant secure funds for her to live on .
2007-10-17 04:48:51 · answer #8 · answered by vpsinbad50 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
hey, the law states that the woman gets 50% because she is a partner in a legally binding contract (marriage) and thus is entitled to 50% of what her husband makes because HE would not have made that if he did not have her help
so she helped him make it! she deserves her cut.
end of story.
not!
2007-10-17 04:50:53 · answer #9 · answered by viajero_intergalactico 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not me. That Heather Mills is and has been in it for the money has been the opinion of many from the beginning
2007-10-17 04:49:42 · answer #10 · answered by RetroDiva65 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think she deserves a lifetime subscription to "Wooden Legs R Us" where each month they send you a new and exciting leg.
2007-10-17 04:49:12 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋