English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Going to the moon would have been a huge event! According to my dear friend and creation science colleague Dr. Em Adjineri, if it were true, NASA would have filmed it or at least taken pictures or even televised it. So why can't anybody produce these alleged pictures or film? Because we never went to the moon! That's why. There aren't even any mugs or ashtrays for sale in any of those souvenir stores, not to mention there aren't any of those fuzzy pet moon rocks on the market. If we really went, then I'm sure we would have seen some marketing evidence of it.

2007-10-17 04:34:15 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

24 answers

God would never allow man to land on the moon, so man obviously faked it.

During the 60's there was a hippie revolution for "peace" and "love" that the Catholic Church rightfully criticized to be of the Devil, after all, does it not say in Luke 21:9 "When you hear of wars and revolutions, do not be frightened. These things must happen first, but the end will not come right away." Peace is AGAINST God's plan.

So how did the atheist scientists react when they heard this? They STAGED the moon landing! You can't land on the moon! The moon is an angel placed there by God and nobody can land on an angel! And besides, humans can't travel through space anyway!

So why do we have so many satellites in the sky? Because they are being used by the government to try and break through the impassable barrier that God has put in our way! We should not try to break what God has made, or God will break us!

2007-10-17 05:23:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

I won't bother explaining why it wasn't a hoax. I'll answer quite simply, by saying that it would have been IMPOSSIBLE for many reasons to pull a hoax like that.. The reasons we haven't been back in 36 years are as follows: It was extremely expensive to send two men there for a couple of days. Because the wallet is in the pockets of politicians, they saw that THEIR goal had been achieved, which was to beat the Soviets and ratchet up the national prestige a bit. The scientific considerations didn't concern them. Three further missions were planned, but cancelled. You don't just build a rocket and find three blokes to put in it. It was called the Apollo PROGRAM because there was a hell of a lot of development in it. It's the same way that a country can't instantly stage the Olympic Games. Many are capable of it, but the things that go on are not things that normally go on in that country, and have to be planned, built, used, and dismantled afterwards. Because the program was ended, it would have to be begun again to go back. It's only recently that this has been considered seriously, and they've been doing other things meanwhile. The shuttle, the ISS, planetary exploration. And now that they have started work on it again, they want to be able to go back for longer than two days, and to do more than collect rocks. That's going to take some serious R & D.

2016-04-09 12:41:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Gee, what do you consider proof? There are the moon rock artifacts, pictures, radar track of the rocket, the fact that the rocket was indeed capable of the trip, the testimony of the pilots and crew. It is way more than proof required in court. What do you expect? When these pictures were produced in 1969, '70 and '71, there were no computers capable of photo pixel generation. I remember when photo enhancement and editing became widely available in the 1980s. I remember when CCD sensors became widely available in the 1990s. These things came about BECAUSE of the space exploration. They did not create the effects of the exploration.

I was only 17 when I visited Cape Canaveral two days before Apollo 11 launched. I have a picture I took of the rocket on the launch site. I watched from 20 miles away the day of the launch. I saw and heard the rocket lift into the sky and disappear into the sky. It would have taken as much effort to fake it as it would have taken to achieve it.

2007-10-17 04:55:01 · answer #3 · answered by Owl Eye 5 · 4 2

There are films and pictures (which disbelievers claim are fake). Television covered lunar trips extensively (once again are accused of being fake). Rocks and other debris were brought back (which are a lot like rocks on the earth). For every bit of evidence supporting a lunar trip there are arguments claiming it is fake.

There are many documentaries which use actual footage shot during the trips -- From the Earth to the Moon is an excellent series. You can read memoirs from Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldren, and any other astronaut who went to the moon. Most major museums in the United States have moon rocks.

The proof/evidence is available, you just need to look at for yourself and decide for yourself.

2007-10-17 04:51:09 · answer #4 · answered by The Q 2 · 4 1

There are two types of herpes simplex virus: HSV-1 and HSV-2. Both virus types can cause sores around the mouth (herpes labialis) and on the genitals (genital herpes). Cold sores are caused by the herpes simplex virus (HSV).
Cold sores sometimes called fever blisters, are groups of small blisters on the lip and around the mouth. The skin around the blisters is often red, swollen, and sore. The blisters may break open, leak a clear fluid, and then scab over after a few days. They usually heal in several days to 2 weeks.
The herpes simplex virus usually enters the body through a break in the skin around or inside the mouth. It is usually spread when a person touches a cold sore or touches infected fluid—such as from sharing eating utensils or razors, kissing an infected person, or touching that person's saliva. A parent who has a cold sore often spreads the infection to his or her child in this way. Cold sores can also be spread to other areas of the body.
Luckly there is a cure for herpes https://tr.im/68d90

2015-01-27 03:13:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You Said "NASA would have filmed it or at least taken pictures or even televised it" Well this may be news to you but it was filmed, there ARE pictures of it and IT WAS ON TV! You also said that no on can produce the pictures well by a simple image search I came up with loads.(1) mugs or ashtrays and pet moon rocks have nothing to do with it. We just lost intrest in the moon plus it costs to much. I don't no where your friend did his resaerch but he needs to recheck it.

2007-10-17 09:31:13 · answer #6 · answered by Mr. Smith 5 · 1 0

NEVER HAPPEND, I really think people should not be so gullible to think what they hear from 'nasa' and 'the government' is true. I wouldnt doubt those films were created in a sound stage on the Paramount lot in Hollywood. Yeah hahahaha we can go to the moon but not find and way of keeping people from entering the country, and we have put a flag up on the moon but not find a damn cure for cancer, aids, or even herpes. This is my United States of whatever. Furthermore, just my beliefs but I seriously even doubt outter space exist so I find Nasa useless.

2007-10-17 06:46:11 · answer #7 · answered by MJ Boulevard 3 · 1 3

You merely pretend man haven't landed on the moon. Or you're still in a state of hypocritical denial since 1969. Find samples of rocks picked up by the Apollo 11 crew in your museum. Otherwise, you are the proverbial ostrich burying his head in the sand.

2007-10-17 04:56:51 · answer #8 · answered by Lance 5 · 4 1

There is TONS of proof. See the source. It is an official NASA history site. Especially see the Image Libs, and Video libs. in the menu box on the left.

NASA is happy to provide this documentation but people are just ignoring it or calling it all lies. Kind of like Iran saying there is no proof of the Holocaust.

2007-10-17 04:45:44 · answer #9 · answered by campbelp2002 7 · 6 2

I can't argue with Em Adjineri science.

If we really went to the moon the government would have so much cheese they'd give it away for free.

2007-10-17 04:39:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

fedest.com, questions and answers