When asked about progress in Iraq and specifically about Al Quada Bush replied "We hurt 'em bad".
Since Al Quada never existed in Iraq under Sadam. Then After Bush invaded Iraq and ousted Sadam. Al Quada moved in- floureshed and is now established.
Is that what bush meant about Al Quada in Iraq when he said "we hurt 'em bad" ? that he propegated Al Quada?
2007-10-17 04:09:52 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Has he EVER been correct ? Just wondering.
Short answer is : no.
2007-10-17 04:13:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
Yes he is correct. It doesn't matter if al quada was in iraq before it only matters that they are there now. When they chose to go into iraq and take on our guys, it was a blessing. I'd much rather have them there than in the US. Bush did not create al quada, he just wants to destroy it
2007-10-17 05:50:09 · answer #2 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
As long as they are al-quaida and they are dead, that is a good thing to me. Bushies think that all anti-war people want to report or hear is bad news. That could not be farther from the truth. I want good news out of Iraq. I want to hear that we are winning from a credible source. Unfortunately, I do not believe anything that they say anymore. They came up with this "we have defeated al-quaida in Iraq chant around the time of the Petraeus testimony. They needed something to get the people behind the President again.
Car bombings are down from 2 per day to 1 per day. Of course, many of those al-quaida that were going to Iraq are now going to Afghanistan (and some intelligence suggests Europe and the US).
2007-10-17 04:16:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The Bush family started this terrorist organization and others. Osama is a good family friend of the Bushes. Look at the so called Osama tapes when they play them. They have been put together and what he is saying on these tapes does not match his mouth or his demeanor. They are propaganda lies. Bush and Cheney are responsible for 9-11. They ordered it in order to take our freedoms away, one after another. Now they are turning us into the North American Union. Just like the European Union. This includes USA, Mexico, Central America and Canada. The coins are being minted this year for our new country. A ten lane highway from Mexico to Canada is being built for Mexico. Their trucks don't have to meet our standards and they are all ready on our roads and they are dangerous. I am sick at what is happening to our country and our rights. We have got to stand up and fight.
2007-10-17 13:07:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I believe it is a good thing for Al Quada to organize in Iraq. It was a convenient fact that we already had troops deployed to that area. So it is allot nicer to be fighting them in Iraq then having to fight them here. The idea that we have hurt them is correct. We have captured and kill many of the Al Quada leaders. Fo you I would recommend picking a side and sticking with them. Al Quada has enough recruits as it is.
2007-10-17 04:23:42 · answer #5 · answered by Twigits 3 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Al Qaeda is running training camps in Pakistan and most of them are going to stay there. It's stupid to believe that Al Qaeda, who wasn't in Iraq before the war, would flock in droves to die at the hands of the U.S. military. There may be some Al Qaeda members in Iraq; but we are mainly dealing with insurgents and sectarian violence which Iraq didn't have before the war. Al Qaeda likes to convince idiots to suicide-bomb places, they are not an army.
2007-10-17 04:16:31 · answer #6 · answered by speaking_my_mind 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's jsut more of Bush's sound bytes.
We haven't--and won't--hurt lal-Qaida seriously with anything we do in Iraq. The reason is simple--the leadership, training and organizational resources, etc. are all elsewhere (mostly safe in Pakistan). The only "al-Qaida in Iraq" are low-level types--the rank-and-file types. Evenif we killed or captured all of them, it wouldn't affect the organization seriously.
2007-10-17 04:24:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Now that there is finally Congressional oversight Bush seems to be acting differently. He knows he can't cover things up or be allowed to get away with things. He is trying to salvage his failed presidency.
2016-05-23 04:02:55 · answer #8 · answered by vonda 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lol... isn't he just too funny.. We hurt them bad.. yeah right... he hasn't even thought about them for such a long time it is ridiculous...
Al Queda is alive and well and living in Iraq.. which Bush made easier for them to infiltrate with this stupid invasion/oil hunt of his.
Why does this man even talk anymore.. and why do we even bother to ask him questions.. he just lies and lies and lies!
2007-10-17 04:30:01 · answer #9 · answered by Debra H 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yeah he was correct when he said it but it should've been referenced to our military members and not Al Quada!!!!!!!!!
2007-10-17 04:17:47 · answer #10 · answered by ms_sokin 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, he did hurt 'em bad, like women and children in Iraq.
2007-10-17 04:12:57 · answer #11 · answered by Becky Go-Belmonte 3 · 6⤊ 0⤋