2007-10-17 03:41:10 · 4 answers · asked by christina 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
For examples, just look at all the Q&A on here regarding illegal downloading, and the weak rationalizations offered for its justification, such as: They charge too much, the artists make more than enough money, I can't afford to buy CDs, the record companies are greedy, music should be free, and on and on.
2007-10-17 05:03:56 · answer #1 · answered by J P 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's unclear what you are asking.
Cheaters are those who cheat -- who break the rules, and from the terminology, we'd assuming in a non-criminal fashion.
Blaming the innocent is a common occurrence -- the whole idea of a "scapegoat" being centuries old -- and standard practice in politics, business, law and many other fields.
Personally, I think people should admit when they are wrong -- and that the systems should allow for honest mistakes, so that people can safely admit when they were wrong -- and that leaves the people who were intentionally breaking the rules the only ones punishable for breaking those rules.
2007-10-17 10:50:37 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
My say is that the majority of them have found their way to Y/A and Y/A protects them.
2007-10-17 12:19:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In what context is someone cheating? A relationship? their taxes? In school?
2007-10-17 10:49:00 · answer #4 · answered by Eric D 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋