Why is it that Bush is giving so much money to this damn war but yet the waiting list to get Child care assistance is 1 year long. Here where I live in NC the waiting list is at a year. Why can he not help the people in the US that want to work of course our unemployed levels are going to be high if he cant provide money to help the ones that are trying to get out of ruts. Okay lets just keep the poor poorer is that it????? WTH??
2007-10-17 03:35:45 · 6 answers · asked by DeborahUlloa 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I wasn't gonna answer this but Beau's response got my blood boiling. First of all, WHERE does it say that she is on WELFARE???? Second, I am going to assume that you have no children, otherwise you would know how expensive it is to put them into daycare (anywhere from $75-$125 per week per child). So, if you have 2 children, and you can find a decent day care center for $75.00 per week. You are working 40 hours a week at $6.50 an hour. You are making $242.00 a week gross, after taxes about $190.00, maybe $200. If you are lucky enough to find a job where you can walk to work ( gas prices these days???) So, after you pay daycare you are making $50.00 a week. And out of that you are supposed to be able to pay for your rent, utilities and food????? Child care assistance is only given to parents that are WORKING. If you are working then chances are you are not on welfare.
I definitely agree that Bush's priorities are a little, OK a lot, messed up. And we all now know that he lied to the American people about WHY we went to war in the first place. We desperately need a president that is going to take care of domestic problems before we go picking fights with other countries.
2007-10-17 03:58:22 · answer #1 · answered by barb 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wasn't gonna answer this yet Beau's reaction have been given my blood boiling. at first, the place does it say that she is on WELFARE???? 2nd, i visit think of which you haven't any longer any little ones, or you would be attentive to the way costly this is to place them into daycare (everywhere from $seventy 5-$a hundred twenty five each and every week according to new child). So, in case you have 2 little ones, and you could detect a respectable day care center for $seventy 5.00 each and every week. you're working 40 hours a week at $6.50 an hour. you're making $242.00 a week gross, after taxes approximately $a hundred ninety.00, according to danger $2 hundred. while you're fortunate sufficient to locate a job the place you could walk to paintings ( gas expenses presently???) So, once you pay daycare you're making $50.00 a week. And out of which you're meant to be waiting to pay on your hire, utilities and foodstuff????? new child care help is barely given to individuals that are working. while you're working then possibilities are high you're no longer on welfare. I genuinely agree that Bush's priorities are a splash, ok plenty, tousled. And all of us now be attentive to that he lied to the american human beings approximately WHY we went to conflict interior the 1st place. We desperately prefer a president that is going to shield family contributors problems till now we circulate picking fights with different international places.
2016-10-09 09:57:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your looking at it the wrong way. If the waiting list is a year long maybe you should start a daycare of your own and profit from everyone else's misfortune. Sounds like you could charge and arm and leg and even find some other mothers/fathers to help start the program.
2007-10-17 03:44:51 · answer #3 · answered by daigle451 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You know what Beau sometimes Sh** happens. How do you know her spouse/father of her child is not passed? There are a lot of complications that happen with children and marriage, do not assume that everyone that needs assistance is out to get free money or that they always need assistance. Sometimes its just a string of bad luck.
2007-10-17 03:45:52 · answer #4 · answered by Adams Chick 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Republican party is generally against: sex ed, birth control and abortions.
They are generally for cutting funds in: government assistance for childcare and food, Welfare and education in general.
There's a huge conflict here. They don't want to educate a woman or provide her with birth control, then when she gets pregnant they don't want to help her raise the child.
They're assholes, that's why.
2007-10-17 03:45:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why do women not take birth control, or just sleep around to have kids, to increase the welfare check, and then complain because they don't have enough money. If there is a father, why doesn't he take some responsibility for the child's care. If you chose to have a child, by sleeping with some guy, and he isn't around to help out, is this our fault. I think not! You had a choice, and made it, now live with it.
2007-10-17 03:42:01 · answer #6 · answered by Beau R 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋