Can the Bush family be considered American royalty?

Question

Liberals often refer to the Kennedy family as royalty and consider America's time of "Camelot" as JFK's term in office.

In comparison the Bush family has two presidents and one governor in their immediate family. The Kennedy family has two DOA's and one attempted suicide by drowning.

Answer 1

Royal Pain In The As*
thats all

Answer 2

Jackie Kennedy Onassis once said she regretted she let the public think they lived a Camelot life in the White House as they did not.
We do not have royalty in America only elected officials. Some think maybe they should be considered Royalty but Royalty are born not elected . Good Question.

Answer 3

I have a hard time saying that we have "royalty" in the United States. We do, however, have powerful families who govern us. These powerful families include politicians on both sides, the most recognizable being the Bush, Clinton, and Kennedy families.

This ultimately goes against what the United States was founded on, however. And we really should be annoyed by it rather than continue to elect these families into office.

Answer 4

The term "American Royalty" is demeaning - it's why we emancipated from the UK. BTW, Camelot didn't allow a petty dictator to put missies off of their coast.

I'm pretty sure unless something weird happens, the Bush family is pretty much done after this presidential term - right or no. I don't see Jeb doing anything major any time soon, so in a way, they are like royalty - do enough wrong, and the lineage mysteriously goes away.

"If we can't weed them out, we'll breed them out..."

Answer 5

I don't consider the Bush family or the Kennedy family royalty. They're just American families that happen to be famous.

Answer 6

Naw, good old boys aren't into the royalty thing. Now, the Kennedys all seem to THINK they are royalty. They have tons of money, want to jack up our taxes wirh no consideration to the effects, and have a soap opera private life equal to the Brits.

Answer 7

Makes approximately as plenty experience because of the fact the rhetoric coming from all angles. i.e. Clintonistas think of Bush is stupid because of the fact he's from the south, greater advantageous yet, Texas whilst Clinton is from ARKANSAS it relatively is far greater disadvantaged. Bushwazi's think of Clintonistas are hijacked by skill of socialists aka communists in drag by skill of liberals and the communist manifesto Clintonistas hate no longer having a monopoly on morality, yet declare it in line with their omniscience with regard to worldwide warming, macro-economics, and blah blah blah. Bushwazis think of Clintonistas are tolerate each and everything yet their rival religous opposite numbers utilising their tax funds as their charity somewhat than by way of their own ethical efforts. in the top, those that get shiat accomplished are those that are focused on what's critical and cope with efforts to make alterations for whats perfect for usa. then you definately've democrats who prefer to biatch approximately each and everything below the solar and protest and bite rocks at human beings. quickly, i think of Bush likes clinton because of the fact he can turn a BJ from one among his subordinates right into a handshake to fellow democrats, everyone who has that strategies administration over such sensible idiots is an enemy i could prefer to maintain close.

Answer 8

They do not have the class needed for such a title

Answer 9

What???