Yuvraj singh is good, but in the matches when he is most needed he is of no use which is opposite in the case of andrew symonds. So definitely andrew is better.
2007-10-17 00:46:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Andrew Symonds easily
2007-10-17 01:32:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
I personally like Andrew Symonds very much
2007-10-17 01:46:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Tripitaka 2
·
3⤊
2⤋
you notice the two certainly one of them are authentic journey winners you could no longer spottoo many differences between the two aside from capability and skill i think Clarke has the type besides via fact the swashbuckling suggestions-set and in case you notice Symonds he's greater like M.S Dhoni style of a participant via fact he has unique strokes in his bag and likewise between the biggest sloggers obtainable on the instant, the two Symonds and Clarke are the acceptable selections required for a captain.
2016-10-07 02:19:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by teresa 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Symonds,it is so obvious after the current ODI series.
Yuvraj was good in T20.
The next T20 match in Mumbai will reveal if Yuvi can retain his lead..
2007-10-17 02:55:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by karikalan 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Andrew Symonds coz he is more consistent in batting than yuvi.
2007-10-17 02:34:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by SACHIN 2
·
3⤊
2⤋
Symonds, can field and bowl better aswell as been a better batsman.
2007-10-17 03:37:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by dikon90 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
symonds
though yuvraj hit 6 sixers in an over andyuvraj is only useful for20 or 50 over match
2007-10-17 03:20:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jo 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yuvraj singh,No doubt,Cleaner hitter of the ball,More power,and more aggression...
2007-10-17 05:16:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ross 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
symonds is far better in both batting and bowling
2007-10-17 04:08:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋