Black or Female President?

Question

Which do you think America will see first and why?

Answer 1

Female more than likely. This is due to less discrimination towards females than black Americans.

Either way, the first president not to be white and male will end up as a scapegoat. Its sad, but true. We have far too many ignorant and moronic people in our country to allow such a change to occur without consequence.

Answer 2

Well I would have voted for Condi Rice or Powell in a heartbeat. But not because they're black, but because they are both brilliant and Patriotic American's. They both went up through the ranks and earned their way to the top, they paid their dues and did the crappy jobs first.

However a certain female who is seeking the Presidency, basically rode her husband to her current status and has done very little during her stint in the Senate.

Answer 3

Well, looks like we're going to see one or the other this time around unless Christopher Walken carries through with running for president.

Answer 4

Greetings. ever since the American revolution was started and run by the wealthy English in America against the wealthy English back in the British isles, the only ones allowed to be president have been of English, or British Isles, ancestory. no one of any other nationality ancestory has ever been president, they are not allowed to even run. so since to be president one needs to be 1. wealthy. 2. white and it helps if one is related, no matter how distantly, to the ruling monarchy in England as our current president is. 3 has to be male and to not be a member of any religion that the Royal house of England does not approve of. such as Catholic, whose only representative in the office has been Kennedy, (and him only because he traces his ancestory back to Ireland that is part of the British Isles.) Never Moslem, or strange Sects of Judism like the snake kissers in our south. 4. The party running has to be in collusion with the political machine here, which is the Republican and Democratic party, both of which are in collusion but staged to appear as opposites. Like the two sides of a magnet, both on the same magnet but thought to be opposites. Since that has been so since the successful revolution by the British against the British and since we still have the same British controlled government that ignores somewhere around 95% of the population here, who do not come from Britian, then a Moslem Black stands no chance of being elected no matter how many people vote for him or her. Since a female is by definition, even though she be British, she cannot be elected because she is not a male. And don't let the polls fool you. the votes are counted by the government. regardless of how many people are for a candidate the government decides who won. and with our secret ballot how could you prove who actually won by vote? you can't. I would bet on lose for all three candidates you mentioned.

Answer 5

Hmm.Thats a tough one.I'd have to say...prob.....woman.Hillary is really going for it.Or some other woman.Unfortunatly there is still a black issue here in the states.We're still predjudice ....and we're not hiding it well.I could care less as long as they know what their doing,to benefit the country.

Answer 6

Female, because I think that there are too many prejudice people to vote for a black man.

Answer 7

in this case specifically, one can only hope neither. the black president is tax and spend from jump and the female is a co conspirator of the clinton.."legacy". one can only hope the electorate sees through the mountains of liberal diatribe.

Answer 8

And out of Right Field comes Condi - two firsts for the price of one

Answer 9

Obama's not quite ready for prime time yet.

Clinton has alot of baggage.

It's going to be a close election (if you don't think so, explain why Bush won the second time)

Answer 10

Either one when a party decides to run viable candidates, and not jokes like Shillary and Obama.