They were supposed to be world beaters or at least contenders, and now are wondering if they can even compete in a weak NFC West. The Offense is pathetic, as their O line vastly underperforms, RB refuses to take a hit or run strong, receicers who cannot get open, and a QB who is becoming like Grossman before our very eyes.
Am I the only severely disappointed Seahawk Fan? Anyone think they could actually be competitive this year?
2007-10-16 20:24:57 · 15 answers · asked by lmspencr 4 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
well think about who they lost. Mac Strong (retired) Deion Branch (is just coming back from an injury) Shaun Alexander (has a cast still so he has a hard time holding on to the ball and he doesn't want it to get worse so hes a bit more worried about protecting his arm). They lost lots of there best offense people to injury's. Late this season or early next season they should be back other than they dont have strong. so we should start seeing the seahawks we remember from last year(i Hope).
2007-10-16 20:39:18 · answer #1 · answered by Blaze16 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. While their start is disconcerting, Holmgren is a master mind. I'm sure he can get them right back in that sorry division. Who are they with? Arizona, St. Louis, and San. Fran. Arizona has a quarterback named Tim Rattay starting. Never heard of him? Neither has the rest of America.
The Rams, they can't even win a game, let alone the division.
San. Fran. has the only potential D to stop you from a division title. And oh by the way, the last time holmgren D went to the bay. They BROKE Alex Smith.
No, due the facts above, They are not the biggest dissipointment. I'd give that title to the NO. Saints.
2007-10-17 06:45:32 · answer #2 · answered by Tha Syko Clown 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with Spinnah, St Louis is more disappointing than Seattle. With the amazing stats that Bulger put up last year combined with Jackson's NFL-leading all purpose yards last year, I would've expected much more from their offense at least. Seattle was supposed to be "world-beaters" 2 years ago, if any year. But it doesn't matter because they will still take the West.
2007-10-17 03:52:46 · answer #3 · answered by Jon G 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I Think the only team that could compete with the seahawks in the NFC west this year is the cardinals.
it is going to be tough for them but they will make the playoff. after that i don't know what they will do.
in the NFC you never know.
2007-10-17 07:08:05 · answer #4 · answered by Bucsfan 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No they cant compete this year but the most dissapointing team this year in my opinion is the saints,damn they suck..but hey there is still another half to go so only time will tell whos truly bad
2007-10-17 03:28:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nope. At least the Sea chickens are better than the Hams. Rams if you still need your momma to wash your face for you.
2007-10-17 07:25:30 · answer #6 · answered by seanpatrick77 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope. the saints are. well they were until they won but still im not sure they turned things around. the rams are disappointing too. but ill tell you right now that the 49ers were so hyped up in the offseason that they are in fact the most disappointing in the nfc
2007-10-17 03:58:55 · answer #7 · answered by cooterpolluter 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You think the seahawks are bad the Denver Broncos are in a 2 way tie. With the RAIDERS! HOW SAD~~~~~ I MEAN THE RAIDERS...?..?.../ thats messed UP
2007-10-17 09:09:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
with the most talent on the team in history, they are deinately underachieveing. holmgren and hassleback have acted like there have no clue as to whats going on, and alexander is just soft.
2007-10-17 04:05:05 · answer #9 · answered by Steve O 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes,instead of looking like a team to be reckon with,they look like a team that everybody wants to play to pad their record
2007-10-17 03:34:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋