She hates George W. Bush, who has the will and courage to stand up to terroritsts and thwart their desire to murder innocent people. She has tried to sabotage his efforts every chance she gets, just to make herself "look good." Yet she puts Sandy Berger on her campaign advisory staff, who had his security clearance revoked for stealing documents that might expose the government's intelligence failures regarding terrorism during the Clinton administration. Is she really concerned about protecting America from terrorism?
2007-10-16 17:05:02 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Here is the true problem! The Democrats plan is to reduce the war on terror to nothing more than a domestic security issue. Liberals here so easily forget that this plan was tried by Bill Clinton and was a colossal failure! During Clinton's terms Al Quade grew exponitaly from a internal problem in few countries in the middle east to a multi nation terror group with its eyes set on the US. Its ranks, allies, and protection grew under Clinton and he never opposed them choosing to stay on the defensive. Also, the planning for 9/11 was years in the works all under Clinton's nose! What should have been a pivot for all of us in history for dealing with terrorism has been manipulate and our security is a stake. The election of Hillary will send a message to all who oppose us using murder as a means for change. That message is clearly "we will not fight back"!
Bush has done a great job in understanding that the existance of terror groups should not be tolerated. He has sent a message that these groups will have no place to hide, no place to run, no place to feel safe that we will not fight them!
We cannot allow the war on terror to be reduced once again to just domestic security! Domestic security without a strong foreign policy is useless!
True their have been miscalculations with the war on Iraq on the part of both the Legislative and Executive branch but do not let that sway you from voting in a strong republican that will work more with the UN! We need to keep all terror groups scared and on their back heel! Clinton will not do that!
2007-10-16 17:54:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Read through these posts and i am amazed at what i hear and see. Maybe in the beginning when the American public heard from the bowels of the white house that we needed to go to Iraq to save our country Hillary believed a show of force was necessary.after all there are terrorists everywhere. Now five years later we can all see that this is taking far too long and that once again someone the American public elected has lied again. All i know is I wouldn't want their job.
2007-10-17 04:25:31 · answer #2 · answered by naturfairy 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am completely for prison reform. Start with the court system, rogue police and some other areas. Education yes, well spent money always. Educate the family involved in the circle that ultimately returns people to jail cells. Can this lady add? Has she ever taken a math course because all we hear is glorious plans and costs? From where? Taxes. Cigarettes, to condoms, where will it end. But sure sounds good. Vote for me, live free!
2016-05-23 02:20:39 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It doesn't say much at all. She doesn't hate Bush for standing up to terrorism. She is disgusted with him for being so incompetent at waging war and creating a mess in Iraq that the next President will have to spend a good deal of time trying to clean up. She hates terrorists as much as Bush and I think she will more effectively tackle the real problem of terrorism. She is anxious to get the Iraq government in shape so we can stop fighting a civil war and really attend to our enemies. Until people like you begin to understand she is not her husband and will have her own decisions to make, which will not always be mirror images of his, then it's impossible to talk common sense to any of you.
I don't think it was particularly smart of her to hire Berger. But he must have some talent she feels she needs for her campaign. God knows he won't be pulling any more illegal crap and they'll be an eagle eye on him at all times. There will be no new scandal involving him.
She doesn't criticize Bush's policies just to "make herself look good." She believes what she says and she isn't afraid to say it. Sometimes I think that's what bothers the Hillary Haters the most.
2007-10-16 17:45:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
No. Because you can't say everything about Hillary clinton and get it typed on this post before your three day question period runs out. In short, she can't run her family, she didn't have the balls to leave her husband, for fear it would "look bad", she was given a senator position by the white house because her husband embarrased her. She has never run anything in her life, not a business, not a city, not a check book and definately not her family. She uses one name on the east coast, another on the west and another in the heartland. Who is Hillary? I hope we never find out. Let her waste her money on a campaign, and I hope she makes it thru the preliminaries because she will never make it into the white house again.
2007-10-16 17:19:10 · answer #5 · answered by Cayuseranch 2 · 7⤊ 2⤋
While I'd like to see Hillary deported to China, I gotta say her hating Bush is not a reason to hate her, a good majority of the country hates bush these days.
2007-10-16 17:30:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
in SOME cases...aren't the soldiers that GWB sent to Iraq killing innocent civilians because they MIGHT not be innocent? IMHO Bush has the courage and will to stand up and do the job his dad didn't have time in office to do nad not just "stand up" to terrorists. If he was so certain of what he was doing...and so courageous, he'd tell his daughters to go serve there!!! Now THAT would be courage. Actually putting a FACE to the soldiers he's sending.(ps...My husband is in Iraq right now. I believe in what HE is doing...not in the war. He is part of the solution in that country, not the problem....and he IS a US Soldier!!!)
2007-10-16 17:14:59 · answer #7 · answered by ssgjwyf 4 · 2⤊ 4⤋
No.
She's concerned about nothing more than the idea of power and control. Any further plans regarding protecting the country from terrorism are nonexistent.
2007-10-16 17:14:09 · answer #8 · answered by Emma 6 · 8⤊ 2⤋
Hillary's concerns are about power and wealth. She could care less about the country.
2007-10-16 17:43:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
She's only worried about looking good.
First she votes for the Iraq war and now that it went south she acts as if she never wanted it? The only think worse than making a bad choice is lying about never wanting to make that choice.
2007-10-16 17:09:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 4⤋