English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A. Lowering employee compensation

B. All of these choices

C. Providing on-the-job training

D. Reducing the quantity of machinery per worker

2007-10-16 16:56:02 · 5 answers · asked by nosey one 1 in Social Science Economics

5 answers

Another misleading MC question. The assumption at work here is that on the job training will lead to more productive workers. Compensation has nothing to do with marginal product of labour, and reducing the capital-labour ratio will decrease labour productivity.

=> C

2007-10-16 17:43:26 · answer #1 · answered by Nuclear Jesus 2 · 0 0

Labor productivity is usually measured as value of output per hour of labor input so the answer would be C

However for the factor productivity of labor, productivity of labor is calculated assuming the value of the output is due to the combined cost of labor and capital inputs. That is the (value of the output - cost of capital) /cost of labor
Therefore assuming the output is unchanged by A and D the answer would be B, .

2007-10-16 18:50:23 · answer #2 · answered by meg 7 · 0 0

providing on the job training will increase the productivity as the employee will find it lot more easier to do the manufaturing process of a good or a service in much more efficent manner.

2007-10-16 23:12:52 · answer #3 · answered by Kaushal 2 · 0 0

properly you may continually come across a thanks to lessen your taxes. come across a robust tax consultant. i comprehend one a dallas monetary consultant john pollock. he guarantees that you're making the right judgements on your taxes. you need to be extreme about issues.

2016-10-21 07:17:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

e.) encourage her to push harder. with best regard.

2007-10-16 16:59:17 · answer #5 · answered by yahooanswers 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers