2007-10-16 13:15:20 · 66 answers · asked by Amber 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
what kind of question is that?
2007-10-16 13:16:57 · answer #1 · answered by HDI Winky 1 · 3⤊ 3⤋
My first instinct was 20 lbs underweight. But I think that would be really disgusting on me, because I have a small frame already, and if I was 20 lbs underweight, I'd weigh about 80 lbs. And that's just disgusting and skeletal.
But I have a lot of problems with the idea of being overweight, too, mostly just appearance and health wise.
I think I'll stick with the weight I'm at which I'm reasonably happy with.
2007-10-16 13:22:09 · answer #2 · answered by Sarah 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It all depends on how short or tall you are and what YOUR healthy weight is.
Nonetheless, I'd rather be overweight becasue 20 pounds below is a sure way six feet under. Overweight 40 lbs. You'll a a lil chuncky, but you wont be in an obese clinic either. And you won't be looking like a Holocaust survivor with downy hair.
2007-10-16 13:18:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Underweight
2007-10-16 13:22:06 · answer #4 · answered by stayc 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Id say 40 pounds overweight. If your a man, you can tone up and become something wonderful. If your a woman, you can work out and rock those curves.. If you are 20 pounds underweight, the anorexic look is not becoming. I think its easier to purposely loose than to gain weight.
2007-10-16 13:21:15 · answer #5 · answered by 1fabdiv@ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
20 pounds under weight!!!! For sure. i was underweight most of my adult life, now that my thyroid has been knocked out I am overwieght by about 20 lbs. Blchhhhhh. i cannot stand the extra weight on my feet. I feel so disgusting when I sit down.
2007-10-16 13:22:53 · answer #6 · answered by Kimberlee Ann 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that's a tough question because the range you stated is too large. if I were 20 lbs underweight I'd get sick, and, 40 lbs over I'd look like a tub and wouldn't fit in my clothes. So my answer is "neither".
2007-10-16 13:22:34 · answer #7 · answered by sophieb 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd rather be 20 lbs. underweight.
I experienced a battle with depression for several years, and was virtually unable to eat. At 5'6", I was a merely 110 lbs. I thought I looked like a walking skeleton, but people kept telling me how great I looked and how "lucky" I was.
After finding a means to deal with the depression, I had lots of fun eating my way back to my normal weight of 130 :)
2007-10-16 13:36:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
underweight. i am overweight, i am 53, i have trouble exercising, well trying to break through the pain barrier because of crook ankles, and i believe the older i get, the harder it becomes to lose weight. i am not a big eater but eat the wrong things. i also know that my weight is becoming a health issue rather than a vanity issue, and it is so easy to come up with excuses. i hope it doesn't take a life threatening situation to make me wake up, but the rate i'm going, it could come to that.
2007-10-16 13:26:00 · answer #9 · answered by ⓑⓐⓨⓢⓐ ™ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
20 lbs underweight.
2007-10-16 13:22:15 · answer #10 · answered by Miss New Jersey =] 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Theyre both very unhealthy.
I was 20 pounds (or more) underweight last year and I almost died. Not to mention I hated my life.
People who are overweight can still maintain a happy life.
Id rather be overweight.
2007-10-16 13:33:04 · answer #11 · answered by Rachel 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋