English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Selective Clinton bashing doesnt cut it with me. We are currently $200 Billion dollars in debt with China and lying that Bill Clinton is responsible for lead exposure is something smarmy far beyond dishonest.

2007-10-16 12:09:39 · 6 answers · asked by Jim W 3 in Politics & Government Politics

dr.meth: "his documented neglect" WRONG! Clinto tried to pass many anti-terrorist initatives but were all blocked by petty Republicans.
YOU BOY ARE OH SO WRONG.

2007-10-16 12:17:14 · update #1

dr.meth: "his documented neglect" WRONG! Clinton tried to pass many anti-terrorist initatives but were all blocked by petty Republicans.
YOU BOY ARE OH SO WRONG.

2007-10-16 12:17:20 · update #2

dr.meth: "his documented neglect" WRONG! Clinton tried to pass many anti-terrorist initatives but were all blocked by petty Republicans.
YOU BOY ARE OH SO WRONG.

2007-10-16 12:17:24 · update #3

6 answers

Were you expecting legitimate arguments? Never bring logic to a fight with Republicans.

2007-10-16 12:28:37 · answer #1 · answered by Big Paesano 4 · 1 1

The reality is that Clinton was able to balance the budget and raise alot of money by compromising and cutting the military budget.

Getting $$$ for looking the other way while Chinese agents had access for political campaign contributions is well documented.....what's not clear is why he, Clinton, wasn't tried for treason.

The Military and their families were living in squalor conditions as Clinton cut the budget to nothing. Easy to balance to budget when you over look the #1 responsibility of the President - protect the country.

Can you honestly say that Clit' tin actually made America stronger? Remember all the terrorist hits, the accounting scandals? The Dot com bust? All the distractions of Clinton lying under oath? (which is a felony) and that he was impeached? Not to mention he was a molester and border line rapist?

Can we really take another four years from the Clinton's?

And btw, $200 billion when our economy is over 15 trillion is not all that troublesome - remember the 80's when Japan was buying up alot of American debt? Where is that conversations now?

2007-10-16 22:01:57 · answer #2 · answered by USA 3 · 0 1

You are quite the little Clinton apologist after all these years of his documented neglect on the war on terrorism and his illicit dealings with the Chinese.

2007-10-16 19:14:47 · answer #3 · answered by dr_methanegasman 3 · 3 1

the debt is a trade deficit, the taken money is a bribe masked as a poltical contributions. your comparing apples and oranges and even for a liberal extremist, thats a stretch.

2007-10-16 19:38:33 · answer #4 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1 1

That Willy sure is slick.

2007-10-16 19:15:06 · answer #5 · answered by teenhamodic 4 · 3 1

a big YAWNNNNN !

2007-10-16 19:37:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers