Great, now this is a question worth answering.
I will watch for these answers.
Irish boy's answer is good, you should give him the points.
2007-10-16 11:49:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
ex nihilo materia! Look closely at a real hard vacuum..it is seething with particles and anti-particles winking in an out of existence. Give it 'long' enough (although time is not yet existent) the inherent instabilities create space and matter which is not cancelled out. You can create any number of universes that way..some still born in which change or time does not exist or exotic ones containing more than the 4 space we inhabit. The real problem is where this property originates. Incidentally from where did you get the concept of a 'large' universe? The physics (and presumably other diverse behaviours of matter) can just as easily exist in a minute 'curled up' space -it's just that the definition of any metric would be different though totally equivalent.
Pretty good after 6 pints ..Eh?
2007-10-16 16:10:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by alienfiend1 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
you're partly ideal and partly incorrect. the enhance of the universe is presently accelerating, no longer slowing. That shows that it probable won't crumple lower back right into a singularity. although, that doesn't tutor that the universe did no longer exist till now the huge Bang. we don't be attentive to something for particular approximately what the universe became into like till now the huge Bang because of the fact the very early universe became into opaque to easy and can't be viewed by. that still potential that we don't be attentive to it became into created then. it could have existed in another kind. whilst human beings declare that the huge Bang is the commencing up of the universe, they're making an unfounded assumption subsidized by potential of precisely 0 helping info. faith of that type is irrational.
2016-10-09 09:06:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No-body really knows but i have a theory which someone else probably thought of first but anyway . . .
Okaii, nothing is actually something that takes billions of years to turn into something. We havent proved this yet because we havent ever waited a billion years. Each bit of nothing is actually an element, and after trillions of years, they all grew and then popped (the big bang) and thats how life began.
Well thats the only way i can explain it lol :D
2007-10-18 09:49:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Invisible Pink Unicorn 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that we have evolved to see causal links between things and the real explanation has nothing to do with cause and effect and hence is likely to remain beyond the scope of our minds. If you look hard enough at things, the mere fact that anything exists at all is the most unsettling and bizarre thing imaginable. No matter how great our knowledge, I think the mystery of why anything exists at all will always be with us. I think it is a mystery it is necessary to accept and participate in as much as possible.
2007-10-16 11:56:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
hawking says that the universe is infinite. There is no beginning and no end. To illustrate the point he is quoted as saying that asking what came before the big bang is like asking what is north of the north pole. The problem for us is that the true meaning of infinity is beyond our comprehension.
2007-10-16 11:51:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
It came from the previous universe that collapsed in on itself after reaching it's maximum expansion capacity, as our universe will do some day.
2007-10-16 11:55:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Neil G 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
From unknown universe.
2007-10-19 04:21:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Richard C 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are stuck in " beginning "/ " end " thinking. Think about what Irish Boy is saying.
2007-10-16 13:37:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i vote for irish boy. it makes a lot of sense for a topic that doesnt.
2007-10-16 14:17:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by random person 4
·
0⤊
0⤋