I hold the Republican party responsible for doing a shoddy job of keeping Bill Clinton out of the White house.
The Dole campaign was half hearted. A disgrace. And boy, did we pay. We're still paying.
2007-10-16 08:30:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
6⤋
Abortion is a greater significant difficulty than money. i do no longer understand Nazi abortionists nor all and sundry who helps them and that consists of Nader. i'm additionally antagonistic to his international warming propaganda and socialist intentions. particular, Nader is greater useful than the Clintons, Obama, McCain and the Bushs yet nevertheless no longer stable sufficient. Ron Paul opposes abortion, gay marriage and company subsidies. i do no longer think of gay marriage is almost as vast an argument as abortion, company greed, or environmental socialism by potential of ways. i think of the full thought is a shaggy dog tale rather. the only component approximately it that may not humorous is that in the event that they start getting the flexibility to undertake. New generations of sexually puzzled human beings will effect. Secular humanist atheist socialism is an quite slippery slope. an illustration of the cases. help Ron Paul. he's taking the genuinely Christian stance on each and all the matters. Beyondger is the Nazi. He hates Christianity and is a blashemer like quite a few Nazis.
2016-10-09 08:47:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You hit a bulls-eye! George Bush among other terrible things is indeed sociopath. This is the best that Republican Neocons could offer to the world. Bush is a true reflection of the Republican-Neocon Party. They should take their Bush and their Cheney and collectively go to hell.
2007-10-16 08:41:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Actually, it's the voters that put the president in the whitehouse. Though, in theory, both parties could nominate a sociopath...
2007-10-16 08:37:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yes when some of us voted for Perot - we put Clinton into office. Will the Republicans do it for another Clinton? This time the This Clinton will undo the 1 good thing the 1st Clinton did. Granted the 1st Clinton did it kicking and screaming.
2007-10-16 08:39:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by viablerenewables 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
If you mean President Bush then no the Republican Party didn't put him in the voters put him in You know all those people who now claim that they didn't vote for him.
2007-10-16 08:38:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by hdean45 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
One does not need to be a p>h>d to clearly see that Bush is insane,,,now the details of his insanity remain unclear,,so many things hes done and yet lol,,,I am not a expert in various mental illness's..but clearly Bush has much wrong...chow,,,add Clinton's are both the sociopathic ones,,not bush,,,his illness is different,,chow
2007-10-16 08:33:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Quite possibly.
According to Dr. Justin Frank (author of "Bush on the Couch") who is an eminent psychotherapist, Bush has massive problems with empathy, considers himself an "exception" to the laws that govern everyone else, and he definitely suffers from a worldview very similar to borderline personality disorder.
Whether he is sociopathic or not, we do know for a fact that he suffers from strong and undealt with sadistic tendencies (one of his favorite childhood pastimes was blowing up frogs with firecrackers). He also created a big fiasco by using a hot branding iron on fraternity pledges.
2007-10-16 08:29:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
5⤋
I agree, serial womanizing is a sociopathic disorder
2007-10-16 08:33:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by a person of interest 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
I like trick questions. Every republican in the White House is a sociopath!
2007-10-16 08:27:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
7⤋