make arrangements with the shelter for the hairdresser to go in and apply to adopt the dog before the dog could be adopted by someone else or is crying the best solution?
2007-10-16 08:04:45 · 8 answers · asked by damron 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television ➔ Soap Operas
That is a basic document with shelters across the country and bawling on TV about it is just trying to give those folks a bad rap. Those shelters try to make sure that those animals that have been cast away who knows how many times don't have to keep getting "cast away". She should have been bawling about giving somebody $3000 to "cat proof" a dog. But I guess her house was too small for the dog to co exist! I hope she reads her next contract better or they might give her to the hairdresser.
2007-10-16 18:29:36 · update #1
That would have been the ideal solution for all concern but I guess she felt it was an animal what's the big deal.
2007-10-16 08:31:28 · answer #1 · answered by Myriam P 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The whole thing is ridiculous. The shelter should have met with Ellens hairdresser to see if the dog had a good home and let it stay there. What's wrong with these people. At least the dog had a home, wasn't on the street, and wasn't in a shelter. The people I feel sorry for are those kids. If it happened to me I'd be bawling my eyes out and I'm not a kid.
2007-10-16 09:42:17 · answer #2 · answered by elyag43 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Ellen made a mistake by not reading the contract and is genuine in her feelings. I hope the shelter does the right thing - which is to give the little dog back to the girls Ellen gave it to. I'm sure she's trying everything she can.
2007-10-16 13:17:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
From what I understand the dog was taken away before any other agreements could be made. She is crying because she is really hurt by what happened. Hopefully, the dog will be able to be adopted by the hairdresser's family.
2007-10-16 08:17:03 · answer #4 · answered by Green Eyed Girl 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Technically and legally, Ellen made a mistake. But the real jerks in this situation are those from the animal shelter. The dog would have been in a kind and loving home where it would have been well-cared for. Isn't that enough???????
2007-10-16 11:48:55 · answer #5 · answered by frenchy62 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It was probably in the fine print and never really discussed. How many times have you signed a paper w/o fully reading it?
So instead of Mutts & Moms saying:
"OK we'll have to charge you $__ fee for having to interview and clear this new home. IF we find them to be an inadequate home we will have to retrieve the dog and replace it ourselves"
If anyone cares to call or write Mutts and Moms, here’s their info:
Mutts and Moms
523 S Raymond Avenue
Pasadena, CA 91105
626.394.0946
(NOTE: This phone is verified, I got a message on an answering maching identifing them)
Email: pawboutique@yahoo.com
On the Web: www.muttsandmoms.org
Another source lists their address as this:
MUTTS & MOMS
4610 CERRILLOS DR
C/O MARINA BAKTIS
WOODLAND HLS , CA 91364
2007-10-16 09:29:44 · answer #6 · answered by Solunas 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
She didn't know because she didn't read the contract. I think her emotions are genuine and she feels bad for the kids. I'm sure had she known she would have taken a different route.
2007-10-16 08:17:24 · answer #7 · answered by Red 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If it was that simple....don't you think Ellen would have taken that route!
2007-10-16 08:48:31 · answer #8 · answered by DK 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋