I mean they seem to pick and choose when they want to be very aggressive on which injustices they seem to blast. I guess it just so happens that they dont care about justice for certain groups.
2007-10-16 07:48:55 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I reread my question to make sure. I knew I never made any specific charge as to who I thought was being racist against who or who I thought Bush was ignoring. I am always fascinated by how the guilty naturally get so defensive and essentially accuse themselves. lol
Its like me asking: "why are you a racist"? and some people come on here attacking me for saying when they are a racist...when its their very answer that actually seals the case against them. For you see, if they were not a racist, they would simply say "hey I know racism goes on, but I am not one. I disagree with all forms of racism". Now thats what a non racist would do. A racist would come on and attack you for even suggesting that racism occurs and even try to defend those who fight against racism as the true racists.
2007-10-16 08:23:12 · update #1
Not only their silence, but their Party's willingness to permit their mouthpieces in broadcasting to "reframe" the Jena issue away from excessive charges of attempted murder being brought for a school fight to a faux issue of "demanding no punishment".
The more recent travesty in which an all white jury refused to bring charges against the staff of a "wilderness camp" for beating and smothering a black teenager to death is another blatant example of injustice...although there is a federal investigation in that case.
2007-10-16 08:14:28 · answer #1 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well, let's see. They employ more minorities than any other administration, and not through affirmative action. I don't see how they've been silent on racism, and I do not find racism to be on the rise. It's been on a steady decline for some time now. I don't know what you are talking about.
2007-10-16 08:02:34 · answer #2 · answered by Pfo 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You are sorely mistaken my friend. However, the issue must be one worthy of action. Jena would have never been heard of nationally, much less out of the state of La., absent Big Al and his deputy Jessee riding into town and planting the seeds of racial divisiveness.
Can you please give us some specifics of how the Bush admin. is silent on racism. Your charge is nothing more than an unsupport conclusion at this point.
Have a nice day.
2007-10-16 07:55:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
There is no increase in racism. It's just more obvious because of recent events. Racism, and that includes black racists and white racists, has always been there and will not go away. The worst racism is not what you read in the papers, it's what is whispered to others.
2007-10-16 07:54:51 · answer #4 · answered by wooper 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Wow you are so ignorant.
Give one example where:
1. Racism has been rising;
2. The Bush administration remained silent on that example.
2007-10-16 07:59:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Which groups? Are you a member of the group you are crying "racism" about? Sorry, but we'll need some facts to go along with silly opinions.
2007-10-16 08:06:31 · answer #6 · answered by Scott B 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You mean like them remaining quiet about the stampede of support the 6 black kids got for beating the hell out of a white kid? Yeah I think they could have stood up for law and order...is that what you meant?? lol Oh yeah steven, bush caused katrina...jeez recycle something else...
2007-10-16 07:58:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
I agree Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson racist actions are out of control and should be dealt with.
2007-10-16 07:53:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 1⤋
They need to abolish the racist policy of affirmative action - yes.
2007-10-16 07:57:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
What did Bill Clinton do about racism.
The same thing he did about al qaeda, nothing.
2007-10-16 08:00:30 · answer #10 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋