Your employer can prevent you from leaving the premises on a break, they are actually paid anyway.
2007-10-16 07:33:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by davidmi711 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I know you are entitled to 20 minutes uninterupted rest break unpaid where the working day is more than 6 hours. Unfortunately it has to be on the premises for health and safety reasons coz if you have an accident they are liable, but if you are only in the grounds there shouldn`t be a problem really, that must be classed as on the premises. Did you know also you are entitled to 11hours rest in every 24hrs working period. Eg: if you finish at 11 at night you can only go back to work at least 11 hours later. I know care workers do silly shifts, if you do maybe this could be a bit of a negotiation for your smoking outside.
2007-10-16 08:33:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by bud 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
usually, unless you clock out during your break you are still on the clock so technically a break is not considered unpaid. You didn't say what state you are in so answering legally will be difficult. If you are not clocking out during your break you are technically still working, so if you leave the work property and get hurt the company would be liable. Perhaps you can negotiate something with your boss where you can log out for 10 or 15 minutes so you can leave the work grounds for a cigarette.
2007-10-16 07:41:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by LSGregg 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It may depend on the break. A tea break is paid, and you should not leave the premises. Lunch breaks are unpaid and you can go where you like. Maybe if you are in the grounds of the workplace, smoking will not be allowed there anytime. Eat chocolate instead !
2007-10-16 07:41:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by caroline 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If this was not in your original contract, they can't force you to obey it. I'm no lawyer (I like being on the right side of the law unlike lawyers) and it's only my opinion but if it's not in your contract for employment then it's not legal. I do own a business but I would never put any such restriction on my employees. I suggest you contact your local labor laws sense every state has their own labor laws.
I'm also the type of person that if someone pisses me off that much, I'll light up a cigarette where it's against the law to do so. I did last week at my local hospital and told that guard when he stops breathing my air, I'll quit smoking. He didn't bother me after that and I finished my cigarette where I was standing.
2007-10-16 07:52:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
It breaks are paid, you may have a problem. If it's unpaid time, they cannot dictate to you how and where you spend it. But it may be a moot point, because most employers can fire you without cause. Even if you're legally correct on the unpaid break, they can give some other reason if they want to get rid of you.
If your company hates smokers that much, why work there?
2007-10-16 07:38:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by curtisports2 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
This has been added to our contract, I work for a Local Authority, and is also a sackable offence - however I thought care homes were exempt from the law because it is someone's home.
Makes a bit of a mockery of the idea if you can't smoke but the inmates can.
Have to say though if it is now part of your contract, and presumably has been agreed with your unions etc, there is not much you can do.
2007-10-16 07:39:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Dee L 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You've already answered it yourself - "it does not state staying there on our break".
Going on what you say (which is all I have) he has "unilaterally varied a contract", which he's not allowed to do.
Take your contract down to the CAB and see what they say - if you're not being paid, I can't think of any circumstances when you can be held on the premises against your will, that's "false imprisonment" if nothing else.
2007-10-16 13:26:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can't speak for the laws in Great Britain, but, the contract you have signed may have you waive the rights to which you may normally be entitled.
There may be legitimate, valid reasons for this stipulation, such as it being the nature of the business that staff may be needed in an emergency situation.
I cannot say for certain.
2007-10-16 07:54:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Vince M 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
What the company should have done, was when the smoking ban came ino force, they should have allocated an area for you to smoke outside the building. The area should have been at least 20 feet from any entrance to the building.
2016-03-13 00:08:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋