... radical Islam, Saddam or Ahmadinejad yet…
As a majority (not every liberal, you know who you are) they ask an overwhelming amount of questions and respond to any of the above by bashing American Presidents, Christianity and America itself?
2007-10-16 07:04:08 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
jpenergy - "Judge not" in no way advises us to close our eyes and stumble along blindly in ignorance and or denial.
2007-10-16 07:32:36 · update #1
truthsee - NO, simply you are wrong. I don't. (hint, READ): as I wrote above: As a majority (not every liberal, you know who you are).
2007-10-16 07:36:45 · update #2
Yes indeed...good question
They have a seemingly infinite tolerance for the brutal, sadistic and evil acts of leftwing and/or Islamic despots across the globe...but serve a terrorist his soup cold at Gitmo and they will attack you with unbelievable fury for denying his "rights"
2007-10-16 07:08:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 8⤋
I think we Liberals must be practical.
We complain about things we can do something about, or exists and effects us in our everyday lives.
Castro and Ahmadinejad are not political leaders in our country. There isn't much use in complaining, or even condemning them.
We are not Radical Muslims, and in most cases, we are not Muslims at all. So condemning "radical Islam" also seems silly, as silly as Radical Muslims look when they "condemn" the USA.
Communism, Socialism, Marxism? Well, I don't know if you are aware of this, but the Iron curtain came down ten to fifteen years ago. China is Communist in name only. There are a couple of minor countries that might still be considered communist, but that whole world conflict thing is over. And I'm not going to condemn Europe, just because they have more social programs than we do here.
And Chavez and Saddam are both dead. What kind of loser keeps condemning a person after they have died?
Hope that helps you understand things a bit better.
2007-10-16 10:12:22 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Bad Day 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I don't block anyone, what is the point of asking questions if you only want to hear answers that confirm what you think? Silly really, anyway, I don't know. Maybe they associate those people with the Liberals of today. Hillary is undeniably a socialist in almost all of her intended policies.
2016-05-22 23:14:54 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have always found it interesting that it is easy to lump anyone and anything together that is challenging to "a line" that is feed to the people to keep them ignorant of the distinguishing characteristics of differing views. Why do we not teach the differences between socialism and Marxism in school? Is is because this society is being manipulated to "not think'" ? You lump liberals into all or nothing categories rather than creating an intelligent discussion. Wake up kids, there is a reason that generalizations are based on emotionalism rather than analyzing what the distinctions are. I think it's call MANIPULATION
2007-10-16 07:28:50 · answer #4 · answered by truthseeker 1 · 2⤊ 4⤋
You answered the question yourself... they are liberals! There isn't nearly as much "clout" attached to those condemnations when you can have an American President, our troops, our faith, "under God" or so many more "Conservative" ideals to bash.
2007-10-16 08:31:10 · answer #5 · answered by Amer-I-Can 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Most of the questions open for condemnation are futile and pointless, if Castro effected my life in negative way maybe then, same with Chavez, but their own people like them and that is enough. it's their country let them lead it. Until we have a flawless system who are we to judge all others, that my boy, is hypocrisy at it 's best, the Bible Say's (judge not lest ye be judged) or do you disagree with that, or rewrite it judge others not thy self. clean up your own backyard before complaining about theirs. So you fell it is your right to pick the leaders of all other countries so that they fit your ideal and any who don't should be done away with? who are you to judge? a self proclaimed Christian watchdog of all that YOU determine to be rightious. your selfrightiousness is pretty overwhelming, man you scare me.
2007-10-16 07:22:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Fidel Castro has hardly been off his little island in over forty years. Why do you bring him up? What did the guy ever do to you? He's really old and will die very soon. End of story.
Oh yeh, it's time to end the embargo on Cuba. If we can trade with communist China and communist Vietnam, why not Cuba?
2007-10-16 07:14:09 · answer #7 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
For the same reason they invite (and applaud for) Ahmadinejad to speak at their universities yet verbally disrupt Ann Coulter, Rush and Bill O when they come to speak.
2007-10-16 07:26:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
I try to answer those questions. But I'm only one man at Level 2. There's only so many I can answer in a day.
2007-10-16 07:07:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 11⤊ 0⤋
Because you ask enough questions condemning them already.
Most liberals do not care much for extremes like Castro, Chavez, Communism, Socialism, or Marxism.
2007-10-16 07:09:21 · answer #10 · answered by Think 1st 7 · 4⤊ 7⤋
Maybe Sean Penn, and Danny Glover rented a bus to take the liberals with them to shmooze Chavez. I think Cuba and Castro will be their next stop.
Are you trying to make them angry? Just defend our country, that oughta do it!
2007-10-16 07:11:33 · answer #11 · answered by Moody Red 6 · 6⤊ 5⤋