English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Cassius asked:

The coat is slowly but surely coming off of feminism for everyone to see what is lying underneat and it is not
pretty, what is underneat. Why are feminists fighting/resisting it ? Dont tell me the millions of men and women who dont see the clothes of the queen are stupid and dont see "what feminism isnt about" and "what feminism is about"
------

What exactly did he say soooo bad to justify the question being reported and why did YA 'customer support' (LoL) remove it? What ToS did it violate? What happened to free speech and need to learn?

I'm absolutely gobsmacked at the immaturity of YA 'customer care' and whatever pleb it was who got 'so upset' they just had to report it.

2007-10-16 06:47:57 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Gender Studies

Deidre O muttered:-
I can't find an actual question so that might be the issue. It seems like he is standing on his virtual soap box and venting which is clearly against TOS.
---
Perhaps this will help identify the 'question' for you...
"Why are feminists fighting/resisting it ?"
and
"what is underneat" (which I figure was a typo intended to read 'underneath' and forgot the question mark).

Does that help clear it up for you?

2007-10-16 07:12:56 · update #1

The Ms.

Please comprehend the difference between having an issue with 'feminism' (the movement) and 'women' (the sex). It never ceases to amaze me how many feminists try to accuse a person who highlights the wrongs of feminism as being a misogynist in the lame (and over-used) effort to gain as much sympathy as possible.
It's old - get a new line.
As for my response to Deirdre - I would have answered any guy similiary who had posted similarly.
Trying to claim sexism won't work - now go play with your Sistahs..

2007-10-16 11:04:16 · update #2

17 answers

I'm beginning to lose interest.
Any opinion outside the 'movement' (bowel movement I presume) is reported. They want women to be strong and independant, but only within the parameters of their beliefs. I have been reported far too often for benign comments that someone took offense too.

For being sh*t slingers themselves they sure are sensitive.

LOL at myself.

2007-10-16 08:23:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

The problem with a "question" like this is that it is a rant, disguised by the random placement of a question mark. The statement "why are feminists fighting/resisting it" is followed by a question mark, but there is no definable question. What does "it" refer to? The coming off of the coat...what coat is that? There are ramblings and mutterings of expectations of others agreement with him in the "don't tell me" statements, but no definite question.

You can not answer something that can not be defined. I did not get to read the original posting so I don't know if there was more detail and the "it" got defined somewhere along the way, but from the snip it you published, there was nothing more than randomized placements of question marks in order to form the appearance of a question.

All of that having been said...I wouldn't have bothered to report it. There doesn't seem to have been anything hateful, threatening or criminal about the posting, and therefore not really worth the effort.

2007-10-16 07:50:52 · answer #2 · answered by lkydragn 4 · 4 2

I, for one, neither agree with, nor tacitly support a great many things said in this forum. Unfortunately I do agree with Voltaire, and His assertion that a person's right to freedom of speech and self expression should be defended by all who believe in such a concept.
The trouble with Cassius's 'question' is that it is, neither a question, nor is it a coherent statement. I rather strongly suspect that someone has misinterpreted His intentions, presumed that He was talking about 'naked Women', and censured Him accordingly. If English was My second language I could very possibly have made the same error, given the composition of His commentary.

2007-10-16 16:59:24 · answer #3 · answered by Ashleigh 7 · 3 0

1. Tradition states that he was 2. He lived in Capernaum. 3. He helped establish the Jerusalem Church but James assumed leadership 4. He was active in spreading the Word to the Gentiles and preached throughout Palestine 5. He died a martyr in Rome under Nero according to 1 Clement 5:1-6:1.

2016-04-09 06:45:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I agree with the questioner. The feminism cult wears a human mask but peel it away and you will find an evil fanaticism which seeks to suppress freedom of speech.

POSTSCRIPT - Yahoo deleted an answer of mine after this irksome pseudo-intellectual fellow calling himself Shingosh complained about it. I had blocked him but he kept cropping up in answers.

Strange are the ways of the Yahoo.

2007-10-16 11:34:45 · answer #5 · answered by celtish 3 · 2 1

Maybe some people (Not Me) reported it because they are pe-ed off with the same feminist/non-feminist questions being asked

2007-10-16 06:54:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

I can't find an actual question so that might be the issue. It seems like he is standing on his virtual soap box and venting which is clearly against TOS. I didn't actually read the question since the boy has blocked me. As far as reporting, he is the one that brags about doing just that so perhaps he flagged himself since the anti feminist enjoy playing the victim card so much.

2007-10-16 06:56:43 · answer #7 · answered by Deirdre O 7 · 6 6

Perhaps his attitude is much like yours which I identify as very demeaning towards women. The fact that you even question why this was removed and then attempt to minimize another women's comments show you have very little respect for women as well. That would explain why they pulled it.

2007-10-16 10:58:44 · answer #8 · answered by The Ms. 4 · 1 3

there must be a lot of reporting going on today, i've heard lots of complaints.
personally, i found nothing so far amiss with Cassius's question that deemed it report worthy (i usually don't, esp with his questions)

i've only reported one incident today, and it was *quite* justifiable!

2007-10-16 06:54:11 · answer #9 · answered by Ember Halo 6 · 5 1

it wasn't a question, it was a rant. tos were clearly violated.

there are lots of really stupid violations awarded (i've had a few myself) - but this was clearly a correct decision.

.....

"What is underneath the Coat of Feminism?" is no more a valid question than: "Which hat does the Easter Bunny wear on her birthday?". both questions have question marks, but neither actually means anything.

this last two days i've been wondering whether i've blundered into some kind of a competition where feminist extremists and trolls take turns to see who can post the stupidest question or answer here.

though i have to admit that the trolls win some of them.

2007-10-16 06:52:02 · answer #10 · answered by synopsis 7 · 6 7

fedest.com, questions and answers