2007-10-16 05:52:19 · 17 answers · asked by realitycheck 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Answer: Janet Reno...The children she gassed and burned at Waco...then deporting Elian Gonzales.
The dems want, to kill and damage children is only exceeded by their exploitation of them as an excuse for failed socialist policy.
2007-10-16 06:04:03 · answer #1 · answered by trumain 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Vermont. Liberal activist judge. Convicted child rapist who spent four years raping, brutalizing, destroying a six year old girl gets 60 days in prison.
Massachutes. ACLU. 2 men kidnap, murder, then rape the body of a ten year old boy before dumping the body across the state line. The men have NAMBLA pamphlets in their possession and claim in their statements that NAMBLA doctrine influence their decision to kidnap, murder and rape (in that order) a child. The parents file a lawsuit against NAMBLA. The ACLU steps in to defend NAMBLA...pro bono.
One of those two usually pop into my mind. It varies which one. What doesn't vary is the utter disgust that fills my soul. Dems care about children? Not in the above two cases.
2007-10-16 16:04:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
My mind flashes to bills like the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act and the Born Alive Infants Protection Act, and I wonder why some Democrats voted against them both.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/11/20031105-1.html
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/08/20020805-6.html
2007-10-16 06:20:46 · answer #3 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hang onto your rights, your liberties and your wallet - they're under seige again!
"The welfare of the people in particular has always been the alibi of tyrants, and it provides the further advantage of giving the servants of tyranny a good conscience." Albert Camus
2007-10-16 06:05:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
More bull....Everything is for the children, well...What about me? I don't count since I am an adult? Before anyone gets all sanctimonious I don't think we should forget about kids, but there is more than kids in this country
2007-10-16 05:59:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Why must we do for others what they are unwilling to do for themselves?
Being unable to pay for your children's health care is one thing but refusing to pay for your children's health care because you'd rather spend the money on other things is entirely different.
2007-10-16 05:58:05 · answer #6 · answered by tnfarmgirl 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Who is really going to benefit and how much will it cost ME again?
2007-10-16 10:36:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They have no real argument so that's the default response.
p.s. 28 year olds are not children. Deal with it.
2007-10-16 06:01:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Pandering.
2007-10-16 05:59:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
I think "Wow, what a good idea. What kind of a selfish, short sighted bunch of idiots wouldn't want to bring up the children as well as possible in their own country, as they are the future of the country."
2007-10-16 05:59:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋