I just saw a news report where the Dems are raising campaign funds at a rate about 3 to 1 to Republican Candidates. Hillary is at 35 Million, Obama at about 32 Million. The closest Republican is Guiliani at 11 Million.
In the Spirit of being a good Socialist Dem, should they not share their good fortune with the Republican Candidates? This is completely not fair to the Repubs and this should be rectified immediately. Should we not tax the top fund raisers and redistribute those funds to the lower performing candidates? just a thought, be a good Socialist and tell me why this should not happen.
2007-10-16 05:18:28 · 4 answers · asked by El Guapo 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
wow, such greed, hatred and intolerance.
2007-10-16 05:29:28 · update #1
Some of you have hurt my feelings. I am just trying to equal the playing field, isn't that what a good Commy would do?
2007-10-16 06:18:55 · update #2
yawn.
why not just take all of the corporate and union money OUT of politics altogether.
that way, you know, the people can chose our leaders...
2007-10-16 05:23:54 · answer #1 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Actually, this is a pretty good idea. If all candidates were on a level playing field we probably wouldn't get stuck with the eventual status quo.
Oh, I get it, you are just another troll. I could put all of your type in a box and say Republicans are Facists, but that would require a real lack of understanding, like the one you just exhibited.
2007-10-16 05:25:52 · answer #2 · answered by wooper 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Who is greedy, The one who don't mind contributing to society or the one who continuously complains about it?
Who is greedy the one who contribute to their party or the one who doesn't?
How ironic is that someone using a nickname like The Anti Lib can talk about intolerance and hatred?
2007-10-16 05:49:38 · answer #3 · answered by Jose R 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Loser. Answer is no.
2007-10-16 05:24:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋