2007-10-16 05:01:41 · 27 answers · asked by realitycheck 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They are building a case to forward their ideas if they get into office.
Example 1
The war was sooo miss managed that we must keep troops their.
This way they can do the right thing by finishing the war; yet maintain their base liberal support (who want the troops out) by blaming Bush.
Example 2:
The war deficit is worse then reported.
Now they can raise taxes because they are unable to control (mythical) spending initiated by the past administration.
Example 3:
Increased spending on government supported health care, because of the millions of children Bush was hiding that lacked health care.
Now they can start a socialist medical program to 'cure the problem'.
By inventing problems, they can provide their own solutions that forward liberal ideology. This will then lead to actual problems, in turn allowing them to increase the amount of government intervention. All under the disguise of bettering our nation.
It is a very, very bad road this country will take if the liberal ideology is allowed to creep in.
2007-10-16 05:14:46 · answer #1 · answered by JonB 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No, that's not a very good interpretation. What they are saying is that Bush has made such a mess that it will take at least the first term of the Democratic Presidency to begin making a dent in cleaning it up. Since the Republicans seem to be unable to clean it up, it seems we need a Democrat
to once again clean up a Republican's mess. That's the message the general public is getting and that's what will drive the vote on Election Day.
2007-10-16 05:23:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Obama did no longer make issues plenty worse. Republicans did. The financial gadget became into exhibiting signs and indications of restoration lower back in January and February. We extra better than 2 hundred,000 new jobs to the financial gadget. GDP became into at 3%. Republicans feared a convalescing financial gadget could make Obama unstoppable for re-election, and as Senate Minority chief Mitch McConnell suggested, the Republicans actual precedence is making particular Obama is a one-term president. subsequently, the Republicans observed a physique of innovations of financial sabotage by potential of fostering uncertainty and discouraging the internal maximum sector from risking capital in new financial enhance. They did this by potential of stressful federal spending cuts, removing the only entity prepared to spend in this financial gadget, and by potential of refusing to compromise with Democrats on the ongoing decision and debt ceiling till the very final 2nd, holding federal economic coverage (besides inner maximum sector contracts) in limbo for as long as accessible. If Republicans have been intense approximately balancing budgets, they had evaluate new tax sales besides. although, they actually do no longer care approximately balancing budgets, basically in postponing financial restoration for a minimum of yet another three hundred and sixty 5 days.
2016-10-09 08:31:09 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No they are saying that President Bush made things so bad that the Republicans can't fix them because of their limited intelligence.
The Democrats are not of a mind set so rigid that they wont try to do things like get a negotiated settlement, bargain with groups and make an enemy an ally so we can get Al Queda.
If you think this is a bad idea, a quagmire of war is worse. All the Democrats are doing is fixing a problem the Republicans can not.
2007-10-16 05:09:14 · answer #4 · answered by eric l 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
I doubt it..l but they should be.. he has made such a mess that it is going to take decades to fix things. The Dems are going to inherit a whole lot of problems at home and more abroad... The Republicans are going to have to take the fall for a lot of this bungling.. there is no choice.
Elect the Dems.. well, that will probably happen.. even tho I am a liberal, I would rather see the Republicans get elected so they would have to fix their own messes for a change.. but I am afraid they are just too dumb to do it. They have had a leader who is a fool and has ruined this country..To tell you the truth, I don't know who is suited to get us back on track.. i think we may be in for decades of bad government and a slow decline of the American way.
Thanks Bush!
2007-10-16 05:09:46 · answer #5 · answered by Debra H 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Scary thought-recent survey (and I know a survrey is just that) cited on MSNBC-84 percent of registered voters feel the next President-regardless of party-will do a better job than Bush.
2007-10-16 05:17:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Republicans are saying they'll double the size of Gitmo, bomb Iran, Syria and North Korea.
Dems are saying they'll repair some of the damage from the Bush administration, but they won't be able to fix everything due to Republican obstructionism.
My guess is that neither side is lying.
2007-10-16 05:07:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
The damage was done over 8 years. It will take time to fix the problems.
Why is dems the only one responsible on fixing the Republican Fing mess? Why dont Republicans actually help fixing it rather than contributing to it?
2007-10-16 05:10:05 · answer #8 · answered by BrushPicks 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
It is hard to believe that Bush was able to screw things up this much in 7 years. But - he did. And fixing things is harder than screwing things up......so yes, the dems will have a hard time fixing it. But it's infinitely better than the alternative - which is to vote republicans in who will just continue screwing things up even more.
2007-10-16 05:09:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Bush gutted SS
2007-10-16 05:16:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋