9/11 VICTIMS FAMILIES Want to know the truth,...WHY DON'T YOU?

Question

You people that will undoubtedly call me a tin hat or some other goof ball title ought to ask yourselves..... because most of you are real apple pie, Flag wavers. Why is it you dispel the voices of the professionals that were on the scene ?
Firemen
EMT workers
Police
Reporters...
there is no shortage of people on the ground that deny the validity of the official "LIE" ... why are you so willing to accept it?,
Forget the 'CONSPIRACY" aspect and just deal with the fact that these loyal and trusted servants have raised doubts based on their first hand personal expierience ??????
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/09/08/eveningnews/main3244411.shtml
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026093059633
http://canadawantsthetruth911.blogspot.com/
http://www.ny911truth.org/

by your own words do you prove me correct...
REALITY IS A BITTER PILL....

not one of you answered the question, not one... in fact you attacked me and ignored my question ... Again why do you deny the accounts of the professionals on the ground ???? as for proof? are you looking for proof that they exist because there is no shortage of video of these first responders saying that they heard explosions, that they saw and felt the heat from the blasts... that the steel was still molten in the basement 6 weeks later. None of this is denied by anyone, what is wrong all of you ,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZ4dVo5QgYg&mode=related&search=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwQa5eokieY

CBS AND BBC are conspiracy sites?, The families Truth site is a conspiracy site?????
W H A T ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Answer 1

I read the first link because I assume it's your strongest argument.

It just says that families are suing to be compensated for the deaths of their loved ones because they feel the airlines were at fault! It doesn't say it's a conspiracy.

If that's your best link, then your "evidence" is the empty set.

As for listening to the "professionals," (unsubstantiated statements from firemen etc), why won't you listen to the scientists? Here are some references:

-- The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) http://www.asce.org/pressroom/news/display_press.cfm?uid=1057
It’s useful to see the investigation team & their credentials at: http://www.asce.org/responds/wtc_team.cfm

-- Scientific American. See
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000DA0E2-1E15-128A-9E1583414B7F0000

-- Massachusetts Institute of Technology. See http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/

--FEMA: http://www.fema.gov/rebuild/mat/mat_fema403.shtm

--NIST (National Institute on Science and Technology):
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

-- Popular Mechanics published a huge article attacking the conspiracy nuts using over 300 renowned experts in http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

-- World experts in demolition have attacked the 9-11 conspiracy theory

http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

--PBS/NOVA http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/

-- Purdue (http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/020910.Sozen.Pentagon.html), and others

-- Columbia University has permanent seismographic recorders that was running on 9/11 which clearly show no explosives during the collapse of Towers 1 & 2, or of WTC7 . See page 2 of
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

The “American Society of Civil Engineers” & the “Structural Engineering Institute” (both are non-governmental) investigated the Pentagon crash. Their report is called "The Pentagon Performance Report" & it’s at:
http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf

Technical article on the cause of the collapse:
http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/Eagar-0112.html

Here’s a very technical article from Northwestern Dept of Civil Engineering:
http://www.debunking911.com/ProgressiveCollapseWTC-6-23-2006.pdf

Also see this trade article:
http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/research/story/0,,2166832,00.html

Answer 2

Its obvious there is much more to any story than what you hear. I do wonder why they seem to always be running disaster drills at the same time as these outlandish attacks. The 7/7/05 in UK and 9/11 here in the USA.
But planting explosives and all that just require entirely too big an operation the US government cant find WMD in Iraq think about that. If the 9/11 conspiracy was as big as some maintain how hard would it have been to fly a few 55 gallon drums of VX gas to Iraq for us to "find".

Answer 3

Actually, it was before 911. I was in Kuwait. The way the Kuwaiti men acted and though the female Soldiers were out concubines. Then later, 9-11 happened while I was in Kuwait. When I saw them dance in the streets in celebration. Right up until word got out that Saddam was mobilizing his armies. Then they cared we were there again. As it turned out, Saddam was moving his armies to bomb shelters and not attack positions, but for two days the Kuwaitis were nervous until it was apparent what he was doing. After that, the police patroled the street to keep the parties out of sight. Also, there were a lot more victims of 9-11 then you have listed there. That is not 'most' of them.

Answer 4

The question I keep asking without getting a response to is why did the FBI have Moussaoui(20th hijacker in custody for weeks without foiling the plot?Retired FBI agent Coleen Rowley has publicly stated that FBI HQ in Washington denied repeated requests for FISA warrants which obstructed terrorism investigations in the weeks before 9/11.WHY?
Keep in mind the briefing Bush received on 8/6/2001!Sounds like treason to me!

Answer 5

I can say for most of the uneducated people in the US the main reason is fear. They cannot accept the facts, the outcome is too horrifiying for them to cope with. Which again shows how weak many are when it comes to critical thinking. In the events that took place on 911 we had too many firsts,First time planes vaporized, first time norad has ever failed on 4 accounts in the same day, first time 3 buildings fell because of fire. This is scary times in which we live and I find it pathetic that all the innocent people that died that day do not have true american patriots stand up and insist on a new investagation to answer questions that defy physics and logic.
Indeed the masses are putting trust into their TV's which if anyone had a clue is how a government manipulates its masses to give up liberty in the false name of security its through a CIA ran media that reports fallacies to ensire their agenda is moving forward. Only idiots would allow a lying corrupt government to convince them that buildings fall at the speed of freefall into their own footprints not just one but three in the same exact fashion. I guess its time for these morons to actually believe in SAnta and the easter bunny too. Go back to sleep AMerika you'll awake in one of your governments fine FEMA camps.

Answer 6

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

Science and fact.

http://www.terrorismawareness.org/know-about-jihad

added: I read each link. Agree Airlines had faulty security. I worked as a International Flight Attendant HNL supervisor & trainer inflight. B4 9/11 it was a joke. And some of the rest...
Keep in mind that White House Advisor to Bill Clinton, Sandy Berger, was arrested for removing documents relating to terrorists just before the 9/11 Commission Report hearings. Taken from the National Archives the information was destroyed and he did minimal time for a misdemeanor. Now back as Hillary Clinton's "unofficial" campaign advisor.
Also if you read the Debunking the Debunking top paragraph's in one link there is blame laid onto the "irresponsible press, including left leaning press".
SO, in my opinion the Clinton's share responsibility here.
For the most part , sadly, the truth is often altered during an election season. Doubtful that bothers the Jihad. The more confusion the Better. Imagine that the roots of Communism stem from "divide and conquer" . Is that not what we have been experiencing here? Thanks for all your hard work!

To your comments added. I would like to add further information. I believe that Swissair 111 was a hijacked plane the US in 1998 let Canadian officials handle. (look at their link). So, I am behind you but not with the line of interest you are following. Not the way it has been spawn as propaganda. Look at the So.Cal fire in the tunnel killed 3 and blocked traffic... MELTED concrete? Bridge collapse's often. We had one in Florida. I trained for months so I can not give you details about airplanes that surpass the Popular Mechanics article.
I can tell you this.
A fully loaded A/C for cross country is a bomb.
Once the Towers were struck from above the flames created a catastrophic chain of events.The fire went down the elevator shaft in search of oxygen. It knows no gravity. Underneath the structures were long tunnels and intricate access to allow and water incoming out and so forth. There was an old power station just by WTC7 . SO as the flames went down all the office materials added to the heat. All the electrical wiring and even faulty building products? Heat melts steel. How do you think it gets put in place in the beginning. Cut and specified per piece? Anyway there are so many scientific explanations. Many are there if you study beyond the surface details that have come out. I have and I can tell you I am convinced That this was a case of our government officials being caught with their pants down.And I am no Clinton fan, what so ever! 1998 he boasted of specific threats to widebody a/c in the Pacific Rim where I flew. I was in the cockpit when news of another 747 in Scotland went down and we had to secure our plane...
Knowledge and years of experience here, that's why I know.

Answer 7

Pro-conspiracy sites that only show what supports their idea of the truth. They only pander to people who dont or wont look into legitimate sites.

Answer 8

I see nothing wrong with keeping the investication ongoing....especially if there is nothing to hide.

Answer 9

Still waiting for your "facts". Nice reading but as usual, no representation of truth anywhere. You see "tin hat", I know the truth, and as hard as it is for you to comprehend, I believe this crazy theory that radical islamic terrorists highjacked these planes and flew them into buildings. Now I know that is far fetched to you, seeing as how they have been supporting terror since the beginning of time and threaten terrorist acts on US soil on a weekly basis. But, I'll just choose let the "facts"support my opinion, you should try that. Stop spitting on the graves of those who lost their lives and grow up.

Answer 10

What your saying is completely TRUE.
Everyone has to wake up and NOT believe everything that is shown on BBC or CNN etc.
The whole truth is never shown, the only news you see or hear about is what the government wants you to see or hear about.