2007-10-16 04:10:49 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Christians...they don't kill others that don't believe like them. i know history might say otherwise but in this day and age, most are enlightened and believe in peace as taught by Jesus, the only true religion that allows and promotes peace.
some of these answers scare me a lot in that some would choose to defend those who would promote their religion by the death or subjugation of others who do no chose to believe as they do, like the ACLU, they defend them but deny Christians they same rights as the willing give to these 'others'.
2007-10-16 06:12:04 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Christians.
2007-10-16 04:18:50 · answer #2 · answered by mountaindew25 3 · 8⤊ 1⤋
Interesting question. Though the necessity for such a choice seems unlikely, I would side with Christians. The reason is that, though in the past it has often been different, Christians today (even counting most right wing fundamentalists) show considerable tolerance for others, even if they might argue with them or try to persuade them of the error of their ways. Communists, on the other hand, generally seem unable to tolerate anyone not of their political and philosophical persuasion, and when in power often resort to oppression, prison, or even execution to assert their authority. There are, of course, exceptions in both categories, but overall I think these tendencies hold true.
2007-10-16 04:21:30 · answer #3 · answered by Rviewer003 4 · 6⤊ 2⤋
Christians. But real ones, not the ones pretending to be for political and social causes, that never read and do not strive to live by the gospels.
Real Christians will quietly take care of those in need, communists will compel everyone to live at the lowest common denominator.
But if it was a choice between communists and fake Christians, I'll just strike out on my own.
2007-10-16 04:24:38 · answer #4 · answered by jehen 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Christians.
2007-10-16 04:16:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋
Christians of today don't go around killing innocent people like communists do.
I'm Agnostic but if I HAD to choose...well I think you get the drift and for those that choose death, I'm sure the radical Muslims won't mind that one bit.
2007-10-16 07:32:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, maybe the Hillary has the best ideas. After all she could expand all those programs she has been promising us and we could all stay home. Go fishing, or whatever we want to do with the leisure time. We would have with the government paying for health care; she could pay our dental, and car insurance along with the insurance on our homes.
She needn't stop there. I need a new car too!
The liberals talk about free thinking. I am going to think big!
2007-10-16 04:37:30 · answer #7 · answered by Moody Red 6 · 5⤊ 3⤋
This Jew would pick Christians.
I have more in common and most likely wind up in work camp if I pick Communists.
2007-10-16 05:30:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Which Christians? Based on the type I would guess you mean(like Falwell and other EXTREMISTS who aren't following the TRUE Christian religion) then I choose Canada. I am a Christian, all that means is I accept that Christ is our Lord and Saviour. It doesn't mean I force my religion down everyone's throat or that I want to kill everyone who doesn't follow my beliefs. Although be warned if you pick Communists most of them will kill you for you.
2007-10-16 04:18:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋
Christians of course. Damn Communist leaders, they were all rich but people? very poor.
2007-10-16 05:16:46 · answer #10 · answered by ? 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋