English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

How many million people died?

Why did Gore chose to do NOTHING about it? Was Bill Clinton sitting on him or something? Was he tied to a chair?

2007-10-16 03:20:49 · 9 answers · asked by junglejoe 2 in Politics & Government Politics

9 answers

And for "inventing the Internet" or for insigating his global warming lies that are being debunked right and left by leading scientists?

LILLIPUT, I HAVE LISTED HIS LIES AS YOU HAVE REQUESTED - link below. Thanks for your concern, and I hope that you will join the ranks of those who see through this lying liberal sociopath, who also happens to be a fat porker.

2007-10-16 03:24:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

It turned right into a UN decision no longer to intrude in Rwanda. It turned right into a UN decision to intrude in Bosnia. also, the US did not take section contained in the Bosnian/Serb undertaking till 3 or 4 years after the genocide got here about. i'm no longer asserting that it become the right decision, yet you opt for to be precise. the in basic terms usa that helped Rwanda become Canada. Clinton must have performed something, and he ought to stay with that. to respond to your question: i extremely do not imagine it had something to do with race. i imagine it become more suitable of a following the UN's decision.

2016-10-21 06:21:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He got the prize because just like Arafat and Jimmy (I'm scared of rabbits) Carter, he bought his way into it. In order to even get on the list to be nominated, one has to pay a fee and it's a hefty fee at that. Most of the people who vote for the peace prize are liberals so of course they're going to vote for another liberal. Because of these three people getting that prize, that prize means little to nothing any more.

2007-10-16 04:18:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

He got the Prize for being as big of a liberal as he can be. Lilliput, Isn't it interesting that we always have to list the articles for all of the facts to liberals. Even left-wing man made global warming scientists say there are many untruths in his movie. We should not have to go get you the articles to every piece of common knowledge fact out there. Lilliput, read and pay attention to information from people other than left-wing people.

2007-10-16 03:34:36 · answer #4 · answered by Bob J 5 · 1 1

By that logic no one should ever get a peace prize now because of what is happening in Darfur while people sit back and watch.

2007-10-16 03:23:58 · answer #5 · answered by Edge Caliber 6 · 2 3

He was too busy raiding the Refrigerator to notice while turning down his air conditioner so he would be cool while eating.

2007-10-16 03:32:13 · answer #6 · answered by ♥ Mel 7 · 3 1

Joe C, please list the lies and the scientists who've supposedly debunked them. You're more than free to attack the messenger, if you so prefer, but not the message when in fact the grand majority of leading scientists agree that global warming is caused by man.

2007-10-16 03:25:24 · answer #7 · answered by guess 5 · 1 5

he was busy creating the internet at the time.

And preparing his " the sky is falling " routine

2007-10-16 03:25:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

OUCH!!! wow, you guys are tough on here. no comment, star

2007-10-16 03:24:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers