http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/gop-targeting-clinton-on-phone-call-snooping-2007-10-16.html
Using the rules from the DNC playbook that you are guilty just by making a charge.
Doesn't this show the true metal of Hillary?
I think so and why should she be trusted in the White House?
Remember this is the same lady who had her law records under subpoena for 5 years and by magic they show up outside her office in DC.
2007-10-16 02:39:47 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Bob this is apples and apples monitoring phone calls without permission is against the law.
Thanks for playing.
2007-10-16 03:15:35 · update #1
Hillary's strategies are very predictible. She is extremely political. In all her actions, look for some (even small) political advantage. She will then shave, cheat, distort, exagerrate and flat-out lie to oppose anything Bush or Republican. Slick Hillary, indeed.
2007-10-16 03:13:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
What is a real disappoint here is so many are so caught up in this Wiretapping business. Yes, it is against the law.
No one looks at the whole picture....so busy bashing Hillary.. take another look.
While Bush claims that Wiretapping will help identify Terrorists, and protect the US, America has Open Borders during War time---an undeclared war that is also illegal. These Unsecured Borders go directly against The Constitution of this great country(makeing this illegal)... does anyone have any idea how many terrorists may have slipped into this country through these open borders?
Stop worrying about the wiretapping and Hillary.. let's start counting who is coming and going.....
Added:
In some states monitoring phone calls is NOT illegal, providing the following: At least one of the parties know... Example-- person A and person B are conversing ...person C is monitoring--person C is third person.
Also, when speaking with a branch of the Dept. of Education I jokingly said " I know we are being monitored" The representive said " They monitor EVERYTHING" I was not made aware of it until I made the comment. Sooo.. you make out of it, what you want.
NOTE: This was in affect 5 years ago...I can't swear it is now, but I have not heard otherwise.
2007-10-16 04:44:13 · answer #2 · answered by Elaine 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The reality that is conveniently over looked by so many is that wiretapping WITHOUT warrants has been going on since WWII- FACT. Bush is just the first one to be honest about it and tell the American people that we are tapping foriegn calls that involve suspected terrorists.
Hillary is a sad excuse of a human being- nothing more, nothing less
2007-10-16 04:12:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
You are talking about apples and oranges here. Monitoring cellphone conversations is not wiretapping. Wiretapping itself is not the issue anyway. The issue is warrantless wiretapping. Information gathered without a warrant cannot be used in court, but such information is often gathered by the intelligence community for the purpose of blocking such things as terrorist attacks and espionage. This is activity that is best not brought to the public's attention or to court.
2007-10-16 02:53:00 · answer #4 · answered by fangtaiyang 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
The only way I want her in the WH is by an invitation to dinner.
And make sure to count the silver before she leaves.
2007-10-16 03:10:49 · answer #5 · answered by Mark A 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Be affraid of the Black Widow! She will destroy us all!
2007-10-16 02:50:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
She scares me.
2007-10-16 02:48:08 · answer #7 · answered by TJTB 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋