Hey "Moody Red" she has the advantage here. What I mean is "Hillary" doesn't have the need to stand for anything. You see all she has to do is hurl insults and criticism at the outgoing administration. Tell America whats wrong with them
and they wont notice that you in turn have no solutions for solving any of them. "The liberal solution" has always been
"We can solve it by throwing MONEY at it." And when it goes
bust they stand back and say at least we cared enough to throw money at it. There is no accountability for these people and their flawed policies.
And since the Media Apparatus is in her pocket , she knows
they will not hold her feet to the fire, or ask the tough questions.
All these Demo lib candidates are not running to become president. Their role in this race is simple, deflect questions that would other wise hold "Hillary" in a negative spotlight to the American people.
Ask yourself this question: WHY WOULD IDENTICAL,LIKE MINDED,(REGRESSIVE), LIBERAL DEM'S BE RUNNING FOR THE SAME POSITION , FOR THE SAME SEAT OF POWER? This is to virtually assure her the nomination.
2007-10-16 05:01:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by "MAIKOO".... 3
·
5⤊
1⤋
Her fence riding, opinion shifts, both sides of the issue rhetoric has been well documented. Hell CodePink is even going after her now.
http://www.listenhillary.org/article.php?list=type&type=115
The fare more important question is this: Is Hillary honestly the best candidate Democrats and Liberals can offer?
Some follow up questions would be: And if it is, what does that say about modern liberalism? And if it is, do Liberals really run the Democrat party to the extent we've been lead to believe?
/EDIT: Dionannan, that was hilarious.
2007-10-16 18:50:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Communism
2007-10-16 03:42:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
2⤋
Yesterday on ABC TV The View
Question: First three things if elected?
1.Begin to withdraw troops "carefully".
2.Use old Presidents across the Globe
and let it be known "Cowboy Diplomacy
is over."
(no mention of Carter...)
3. Economic agenda for Middle Class growth.
Monday October 15, 2007. Yet as mentioned it depends on the audience and format as to her agenda of the day.
It is a poor message to our nation and worse to World Leaders. If you read current events: Putin in Iran, warnings about the Caspian Sea & allies with President i'madinnajacket? First visit since Kremlin in WW2?
China is pissed over Dali Lama and declares no interest
in talks planned for Wed? Hopes for sanctions w/Iran to force
nuclear regulations. Turkey is pissed and has asked their Parliment to persue engagement in Iraq after the Kurdish Workers group. That would cut off troop movements & supplies plus threaten a oil line in the area just opened.
All eyes are on how the US will handle these issues. Meanwhile Hillary Clinton vascillates. Not a good idea in this volatile world. Just pray people realize we need strength in a leader who leads. Not one who just speaks in hopes one follows? Thank you.
note: Bush is already making plans to reduce troops in Iraq.
So the good ole boy network wears pantsuits these days is there any difference.
Bill goes with her, despite claims otherwise. With two you get eggroll. And She also said she wants to show herself tough and effective to China & Iran ... Rid us of the pansies that created the trade deficeit allowing them power over the US. hmmm that pansie was named Bill Clinton!!
And the Middle Class? That's a whole 'nother can of worms and false promises. No Fox TV about it. These quotes are straight from the horses mouth, so to speak.
2007-10-16 02:26:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mele Kai 6
·
5⤊
1⤋
You'll have to wait until the general election to find out. Right now, she's courting her base and donators, so, she's playing to the far left, while trying not to alienate the moderates. The closer we get to the general election, her positions will come more towards the middle. The question is, which policy set will she use if elected president?
2007-10-16 02:59:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by madd texan 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Don't knock it. It worked for her husband. Only candidates that have a free pass from the press can get away with this activity. Anyone else and the press would be drawing it to everyone's attention.
No matter what anyone may think they are getting with her they have no idea what they are in for.
.
2007-10-16 02:13:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jacob W 7
·
8⤊
1⤋
Hardcore
Idiot
Liberal
Liar
And
Real
Yak-***
2007-10-16 05:55:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
Yet there are people who worship her every word and tremble with excitement at the thought of her in the White House correcting all the ills of the world brought on by the republicans.
So Cubs cap, Yankees cap, southern accent, black accent, fake laugh, canned laughter --- take your choice --- Hillary can do NO wrong in the eyes of her supporters.
Clearly it doesn't matter WHERE she stands, only that she STANDS somewhere.
2007-10-16 02:10:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bumblebee711 5
·
7⤊
3⤋
Yup...she stands for Hillary. How much power can Hillary have and can she leave a bigger legacy than Bill.
2007-10-16 05:51:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by GoodTimeDJ 2
·
5⤊
1⤋
She stands for Hillary, and Hillary only. She is so arrogant and has such disdain for the American people, that she truly believes that Americans are so dumb and disenfranchised that as long as she keeps the negativity of their lot in life up that she will get the White House. The sad thing is that she may be right. I can only hope that my fellow Americans see through the charade before it's too late.
2007-10-16 02:07:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by libsticker 7
·
12⤊
4⤋