Are you "for" or "against" our sports games being played in foreign lands?

Question

How do you feel about the "Superbowl" being played in London?
It's being talked about......

Answer 1

I don't like the idea. British fans dont go to games every week, so why should they get first dibs on superbowl tickets. I do think there should be a stadium reserved for the superbowl to prevent the unlikely but still possible event that a team becomes the home team in the superbowl.

Answer 2

I'd be in favor of it as long as the NFL can get more foreign athletes interested in playing football and hopefully come and play in the NFL. Obviously, if there are more football players, then the quality of NFL football will go up, which is something that I'm in favor of.

If you think about it, how big is the difference between the game being hosted hundreds of miles away from you and thousands of miles away? You aren't going to go anyway, and moving the game out of the country won't really have any effect on you.

Besides, t's not really about what you want. The NFL will do whatever will make it the most money. If holding the Super Bowl in London or on the moon means more profits, the NFL will do it. And this is how it should be. It's little American idea known as a free market.

Answer 3

i understand this is performed with others yet i'm a loner at coronary heart so I constantly initiate as a single. wager i do no longer mingle properly. A puzzle with pizazz a good number of perplexing designs that all and sundry a approach or the different tournament and line up. One in no way is familiar with how this is going to all flow what lies below, what flow to make as products are moved away. nonetheless, it in no way takes me long to play a around of mahjong; its infinite secret attracts me to its board on a daily basis.

Answer 4

For regular season games I don't have a problem with it but the superbowl??? Thats an American tradition and their is only one of those a year! I can handle giving them a few regular season games since we have hundreds of those but the post season needs to stay in america. Its called tourisim.

Answer 5

They already have a major sport, "Tea sipping".

Mr. Goodell, u are not making any sense. Nobody holds the value and interest in football like a full blooded American.

Who would call the game? I don't want my sport being commentated by some gay sounding foreigner.

Answer 6

I'm for it. We call the Superbowl winners the "World Champions" and by playing all over the world, we make that a true statement. Baseball and Basketball are already popular around the world so why not the NFL.

Answer 7

Why not. America is sold. Everything is up for grabs for the right money. The infrastructure,financial,and numerous other things are already sold to the highest bidder. The American dollar is worthless green paper that the US government has borrowed on for many many many generations to come. So it would make sense to start selling out the national sports teams next. To bad 99.9% of Americans are to lazy and to stupid to say anything or do anything to change that. I am not saying that to downgrade the Americans, I am/was one. It is just the sad fact of the matter.

Answer 8

For.

Imagine the enormous pool of untapped talent-potential outside of the United States. If we could generate interest overseas, we could see the game become even faster, quarterbacks become even smarter, strategy become even more intricate, etc. The sport is already getting better and better every year, and overseas interest would only accelerate this trend.

Answer 9

Its all about money...I say the NFL is for America, and I don't agree with it...but if you had a company, would you stay national or would you go global if you could?

Answer 10

I'm against it and while we are at it how about baning that idiotic foreign gay soccer from here .