Those are the only votes they can get since they have no real policies.
They think if they are nice to islamofacists then they will be liked, lol.
Vajradharma--kum ba ya, it's not us they love.
2007-10-16 00:56:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 2
·
2⤊
12⤋
OK, one more time and I'll type slowly...
-- Minorities... there are better reasons to like or dislike someone than the color of their skin, who they call their "Supreme Being" or who shares their blanket. In my case, kitty hogs the blanket but our relationship is strictly platonic.
-- Homosexuals... Again, the blanket sharing rule applies. It's none of my business what consenting adults do when I'm not one of the consenting adults involved.
-- Women's rights... It's my body, I may choose to share it with someone else but it is still first and foremost, MY body. "Equal pay for equal work" is only fair. In reality, although I make good money, the only time I know with absolute certainty that I received equal pay was from the USAF. Go figure, huh?
-- Common cause... Geez!! First of all, ANY religion, Christian, Jewish, Islam can be, and has been, taken to extremes and manifested as terrorism. Many Palestinians are Christian, Israelis are Jewish, the IRA is Christian, the KKK and Army of God use Christianity... just to name a few. Second, understanding and seeking to address the root causes of terrorism is NOT 'siding with the terrorists'!
My connection speed is slow too, hopefully that helps in conveying these points succinctly.
2007-10-16 13:13:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by sagacious_ness 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
So, what's wrong with minority rights, and homosexual rights, and women's rights? They're all citizens of the United States. I don't know any Islamo"facists," and I've never known them to connect corporation with government. In fact, the worse Islamotheocrats out there aren't working with any governments, but are seperate, borderless terror organizations.
It's funny you say you're against "facism" which was a "cult of masculinity" but imply you're against women's rights. (here's some stuff from Wikipedia, don't trust it, instead don't be lazy, look up sources on true fascism before you start bandying around the term at theocrats)
"The term fascism: It is derived from the Italian word fascio, which means "union" or "league", and from the Latin word fasces. The fasces, which consisted of a bundle of rods tied around an axe, were an ancient Roman symbol of the authority of the civic magistrates, and the symbolism of the fasces suggested strength through unity: a single rod is easily broken, while the bundle is difficult to break. Originally, the term "fascism" (fascismo) was used by the political movement that ruled Italy from 1922 to 1943 under the leadership of Benito Mussolini. Mussolini defined fascism as being a right-wing collectivistic ideology in opposition to socialism, liberalism, democracy and individualism. ... Fascist governments nationalized some key industries, managed their currencies and made some massive state investments. They also introduced price controls, wage controls and other types of economic planning measures.[ .. There has been a revival of interest in recent times, among many academic historians, with regard to the so-called "cult of masculinity" that permeated fascism, the attempts to systematically control female sexuality and reproductive behavior for the ends of the State."
2007-10-16 01:01:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
0⤋
in case you quite examine the Bible, you will detect many reasons that it can't be taken actually word-for-word (e.g. the two introduction memories contradict one yet another and each little thing all of us be attentive to approximately how species more advantageous). in case you examine it and then see what some who declare it is going to be observed actually, you're able to see that many do no longer do it the two (e.g. in case you have 1st baron beaverbrook and eggs till now church and a pork roast after, you're no longer following the Bible word-for-word, regardless of in case you're additionally insisting or no longer this is used to oppress women human beings and discriminate against homosexuals). different than for all of that, the Bible became into by no potential written as a single e book - it became into complied 1000's of years after the guy records have been written - records that have been by no potential penned to be a area of a e book referred to as 'the Bible', that have been written and editted over the years to examine the social-political desires of people who did the writting and editting, and records that have been complied (to the exclusion of alternative, the two 'valid' works) to examine the needs and political applications of the boys who did it. I.e. it quite relies upon on ideals, and all desires to be examine with an information of the social-political impacts on it, and the historic contexts surrounding it.
2016-10-09 08:15:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Exactly. Let's build camps and put all the liberals inside.
We can use Blackwater as Bush's new Sturm Arbeitlung / SS / Gestapo. Any idea how fascist you sound ?
I guess minorities, women, and homosexuals have no rights in your world? Also there is no such thing as an islamofascist. That is a conflated term created by the Bush Administration to scare people into rolling over and playing dead while a police state is set up in the US.
It feels like 1934 in Germany.
2007-10-16 00:59:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
10⤊
2⤋
Liberals gave weapons to Iran in the 80's?
Liberals go tip-toeing through the tulips with the King of Saudi Arabia?
2007-10-16 01:08:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by ck4829 7
·
8⤊
0⤋
Actually, I just saw something in the news about a woman in Iran that was facing the death penalty for having sex out of marriage,
and I realized these Islamic views of having Homosexuality, Abortion and Premarital sex against the law is the same things conservatives want. Islam law is extremely to the right, and seems to be right in line with what conservatives are trying to bring to this country
2007-10-16 01:05:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Michael G 4
·
9⤊
1⤋
I always thought the Republican Party was the supporter of minority rights going back to days of Lincoln. Today the party is party of the far right and they only support those rights of corporate American and rich and powerful.
2007-10-16 01:07:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
1⤋
Your roof is leaking. Use a hat as first aid.
Indeed neocons support homosexuals (Idaho Statue of Fame)
even "antis" are told to get all excited keyhole peeking lesbians.
Islamofascists uhuh sounds like family of you Christianofascists
hence in opposition to healthy scepticism as met with most libs
when it comes to judging rabid hordes of religiously lunatics who
murder physicists or attend to regrettably non-suicide bombings.
2007-10-16 01:08:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
1⤋
What 'common cause' are you refering to? Or didn't your Right -Wing Pundit gods give you that information.
2007-10-16 01:19:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
0⤋
'Common cause'- Like what? We're all human & have a right to exist peacefully?
Believe it or not even 'Islamofascists' can feel love & emotion, just like the love & emotion you have for slandering others.
2007-10-16 00:55:31
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋