Shouldn't us childless gays consider heterosexuals to have a higher social status than us because they?

Question

predominently raise children.
The raising of children is a vital function in a society, and one that is on the decline in the white western world.
If we are not to be as a race overrun by the muslims, indians, and chinese, then perhaps we should give our straight "brothers" a moral boost?

Believeinyou: I know there are homosexuals in muslim and indian communities. My point is that the heterosexual members of those communities are reproducing normally, whereas heterosexual whites are reproducing less, and that perhaps part of the reason is that whites do not feel sufficiently honoured by their roles as parents

Answer 1

I agree that we all should be giving those parents who are good parents a moral boost.

The very backbone of any society is in the good parents which in turn make good future parents.

The decay of society is due to the declining family unit.

There is place for everyone at the table but the head of the table is reserved for those who responsibly procreate and raise responsible children aka future adults.

The term "breeder" is largely used by homosexuals who feel compelled to treat those with a different sexual preference in the same way in which they don't like to be treated or referred to by those with a different sexual preference than they. It shows a lack of common decency.

Answer 2

There are plenty of straight people that shouldn't have kids. For example these people that leave their children in sweltering cars while they "just run in the store for a minuite" but anyway I'm a straight guy so I'm not gonna try to debate who's better. If you think you would be good at raising a child by all means adopt one, they're are so many children that need a good home I really don't think they would care who is raising them as long as they can be supportive and show the love a child needs.

Answer 3

Many people who are capable of having children don't have them. Many people who can have them shouldn't have them.
The ability to have a child isn't the same as the ability to raise a child well.
And unless you are sterile, there isn't any reason why you couldn't have a child. But special rights? Never. People who don't have children are preventing starvation among other things for the people who do have children. It's all nature's balancing act. Every species, all 450 vertebrate species, has a percentage of gay members. I think, from all the things I've ever read, that ours is the only one that discriminates and persecutes.

Answer 4

I would think if you are indeed gay, and indeed feel that way -- then the answer is for you to surrogate children with a lesbian couple -- and raise the ones that you and they agree you will care for.

The majority of gay men WANT children, it is straight people, particularly hyper Right straight people who fight against us having them. In some states however, we can. Live in one, have some through surrogacy and contribute directly - if that is the way you feel.

I note however that it is more likely that you are a racist and a homophobe -- you did not mention Muslim (meaning Arabic) Indian and Chinese homosexuals -- and I personally know some of each.

Regards,

Reyn
[e-mail]

Answer 5

Um, wow. I don't think we should consider anyone to have a higher social status than anyone else - that's kind of what this whole democracy thing is all about. I think we may have a few other social problems going on here if you're afraid of being "overrun" by racial, religious and ethnic groups other than your own.
However, there are plenty of unwanting and irresponsible people - whites, in this country, if it matters to you - who aren't taking care of and raising the children that are born to them. Our foster care and orphanage population is in a sad way. Stand up for social equality and see that these needy children find good homes - regardless of their parents' sexual orientation. But, for their sake, I think maybe you shouldn't. We don't need another generation of racists coming up behind us.

Answer 6

well lets look at thw hite childbearing record... have white people done better than any other group? i don't thinks so. we as white people breed racism, hatred and contempt. most other cultures do to, but why should we care if white straight guys are having babies? really? the world is over populated, and dead beat dads are on the rise. of course if we have straight friends that are having kids we should support them, but to say that we as a culture/ ngroup/ people should hold white hetoro sexual males at a higher standard just because they raised kids... that is stupid. not to mention the kids they raised are little bastards anyway that have no respect for themselves, their parents or anybody else. lets worry about educating the kids that are here now, instead of holding parents up to a higher light.

pretty lame question if you ask me.

Answer 7

No, you should not in anyway feel inferior just because God did not make you to breed. Not having children frees you up to get out there and be a caregiver to the society the way that straights are caregivers to children. Volunteer, be a doctor or fireman, use whatever talents and abilities you have and you will contribute to this society as much as the straights do.

Answer 8

just because straight people breed doesent mean they are suitable to raise children or be good parents at all, gay people and straight alike can be good parents. Breeders are the ones who have children in orphanages that gay people adopt and raise. Were taking care of their children and loving them as are own, therfore we should be the ones recongnized for our helping hand, right? No. No one should be recognized better than anyone else for any reason, its not our job to be snooty and snotty and look down on people for their weakness' and problems.

Answer 9

10. a guy can under no circumstances placed on too plenty bronzer. thirteen. There are 2 bells that get you out of school. the 1st one tells you to start making a track and dancing, the 2nd announces you ought to offer up. 33. Clocks get extra desirable in case you stare at them and chant "summer season hahaha those have been my fashionable stable stufff:)

Answer 10

you have the right to consider anything anyway you want to. i however do not see it the way that you seem or want to.

heterosexuals do reproduce more directly than homosexuals with fewer obtacles because of biology. it is not impossible for a homosexual male to have children and if he so chooses to pursue that possibility and go along the necessary avenues more power to him - it has nothing to do with other races etc.