English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/7045701.stm

2007-10-15 21:22:59 · 26 answers · asked by merz 3 in News & Events Current Events

lol the inclusion of the word civilised was a waste then

2007-10-15 21:32:40 · update #1

26 answers

leave them with the victims' family alone for ten minutes. Anyone who touched my kids would be dead.

2007-10-15 21:27:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

first electric shock just 20ma not enough to kill most people but enough to cause spasms and pain
then when that fun ends beat the **** out of him
third ram a shotgun up the sick turds *** and give him both barrels
if you think this is to mild I am sorry as it was just off the cuff and have not given it an awful lot of thought but if I come up with any other ideas I will edit ;-)

Edit

when beating the **** out of him you could use a wighted ball the sort that knights used to use when jousting you could likely get one from a co-operative museum

and the shotgun you could use a sawn off that has not had the burrs of rough metal taken away from the cut just to inflict that little bit more pain ;-)

2007-10-15 21:58:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

The best form of punishment is to subject them to what they can't have, from a weird and deeply disturbed point of view I would lock them up and encourage their desires, with no access to act on their desires they will eventually break down completly and cease to function as a coherant member of society (You could argue that this happened a long time ago!!) They would eventually both mentally and physically go crazy thus enforcing on them the same punishment that they have subjected on their victims. To me, chopping off a body part or killing them is too quick and pointless.

2007-10-15 21:33:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

well to those respondents who suggest giving the child's parents access, you are missing the point that a great deal of child sexual abuse is perpetrated by the parents, so you suggest locking them up with themselves?
with ''mild offenders'' therapy and drug intervention often prevents re-offending, when coupled with strict supervision/access to minors
with persistent serious offenders there is no real civilised solution, chemical castration is not 100% eefficacious, and some of the mutilations suggested would undoubtedly lead to more child murders due to frustrated desire and rage
so you are then left with the two obvious solutions, a death penalty, or a full lifetime incarceration, both of which are not satisfactory solutions in a civilised society, although in many peoples opinion committing acts of child sexual exploitation precludes them from entering such a society, and they should be dealt with under different rules and values

2007-10-15 22:20:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Chemical castration would do for starters.These types are usually accomplished liars so any counciling in my opinion would not serve much purpose.There seems to be many levels of paedophilia,let the punishment fit the crime.

2007-10-15 23:01:40 · answer #5 · answered by anna 6 · 1 0

Put them in a room with as many mothers as possible..arming them with the bluntest knives you could imagine....and leave them to it !
BUT it has to be slow and very painful... letting the whole world listen to their screams for mercy....but don't kill him...no that would be to quick however painful....oh no he must suffer and be aware of the fact that there's an audience watching..smiling and laughing....video it and take real good pics of him crying like a baby and no doubt shouting for his mummy !!
YOU KNOW..THE EXACT SAME WAY AS THEY TREAT CHILDREN .....after all, the punishment should fit the crime !

2007-10-15 22:02:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

String 'em up from local lamp posts!!!!

Seriously? Lock them away in special institutions - for life - accept there is no proven cure and the risk is not worth their freedom in society. Make them work while they are there and give them ZERO access to internet and TV

2007-10-15 21:34:44 · answer #7 · answered by Saucy B 6 · 1 0

To Angrymam - I obviously don't know where you have gained your information but I have unfortunately had to work with them and there is a high rate of recidivism. They should all be locked up for life. Most of them don't even think they've done anything wrong.

2007-10-16 09:19:52 · answer #8 · answered by resignedtolife 6 · 2 0

I truely think that maiming or destroying paedophiles isnt the answer, causing them huge amounts of pain and torture wont stop what is effectively a disease of the mind,
They have deranged and wrong sexual preferences aimed towards children but in most cases they can't help it, there is a reason why most people who are paedophiles hide away their stashes of pornography they mostly are ashamed of what they feel.
Im not for one second suggesting that they should be allowed to be free and i do think tehy should be locked up but i dont think they should be castrated - or any of the other things people are suggesting.
I know my thoughts are quite contreversial but its what i believe.

2007-10-15 22:11:55 · answer #9 · answered by hopper13 4 · 0 3

they should have their things cut off stuffed into their mouths pour petrol over them and set them alight, and let them burn to deathvery slowly.
Now if this form of rehabilitation suggestion I have just put forward is put in place I will give the general public a personal guarantee these perves will not re offend

2007-10-15 21:31:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I would love to see the death penalty for multiple crimes like this, failing that, surgically remove the offending parts! These people CANNOT be rehabilitated.

2007-10-16 01:40:22 · answer #11 · answered by threepenny53 5 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers