libs realize that voting for Hillary equals voting for GWB3 except for Hillary care 2 which gets DOA'ed .
2007-10-15 20:43:38 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I disagree. I don't think any president past or future can possibly top him. Bill did a great job, the only time in history where our country had a surplus, and now look at us we're drowning in our country's debt. I know Hillary can do the same and more great things for our country.
2007-10-15 20:53:31 · answer #1 · answered by redkazoo 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
RedKazoo... you're kidding, right? Please tell me you're kidding. Because if YOU are able to think with such failing reason, I can only presume that others are too.
Lucky is right, GWB has come out of the closet in support of Hilary which tells me that he's hoping that she will pursue the same irresponsible, ineffective, and suicidal policies that he does.
I liked Daddy Bush, but Jr. appears to have acquired a recessive gene from the bloodline... the one that no one ever talks about.
Watch the video below... this is not a man conceding the failure of his son, these are tears of genuine sorrow and shame... maybe he was hoping Jeb would restore the family name and everyone would eventually forget about Junior.
It must break his heart to see what George Jr. has done.
2007-10-16 10:36:34 · answer #2 · answered by Patti Jo E 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Libs are not going to realize something that is patently untrue.
Hillary and Dubya have a very different stance on many issues. And the healthcare policy is very workable so should have no problem passing.
2007-10-16 04:17:31 · answer #3 · answered by Sageandscholar 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hillary is way to far to the left for this country. She would do good in Russia though.
I Cr 13;8a
2007-10-16 17:41:34 · answer #4 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
answer to "redkazoo":
Bill screwed the country bad!!!!!!
didn't do crap for 8 years on the Muslims attacking us day in and day out, 1993 WTC 1, embassies in Africa bombings, barracks in Saudi Arabia bombings, the USS Cole, and on and on!!
then....
that surplus you people are so proud of was money NOT spent on defense, and a country defenseless!:
...the reason why we had a military in 2000 HALF the size of what we had in 1992!....
(Air Force lost half it airwings from 25 to 12!, Navy we went from almost 600 ships to less than 290!, and the worse the Army from 24 divisions to 12....12!!!!)
...and in addition, the reason in 9/11 in the ENTIRE FBI there were only 3 Arabic translators in the entire FBI....the entire FBI!!!!!!!!!
they cought us with our pants down singing cumbaya!, because "hey Clinton said it is all good, isn't?"
idiots!
he played politics with the money he SHOULD have kept spending on defense and counterintelligence!1
..why?
just to look good to people idiotic like you who had not clue on what really was going on, leaving you, and I and all of us defenseless, when we had one of the major catastrophes of our history coming to us...!9/11!
so no if it was up to me old Clinton should have bee sent to prison!
2007-10-16 04:19:30 · answer #5 · answered by Krytox1a 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋