English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-10-15 20:35:17 · 13 answers · asked by in any other world 1 in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

I don't really care for Hillary, but if nothing major changes between now and next year at this time she is a shoe-in.

2007-10-15 20:42:57 · answer #1 · answered by UriK 5 · 0 0

Hillary Clinton has the intelligence as a lawyer and experience as a Senator and former First Lady who is favored to win in 2008.

VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will likely win.

2007-10-16 04:44:14 · answer #2 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 0

Hillary seems to have the democratic side wrapped up, but she has far too many things working against her to win the general election:

--Senators almost never win the presidency
--Democrats have never won the popular vote for president in the last 30 years, and only twice in the last 60 years
--Hillary has almost no political experience
--No woman has ever won

Balls and chains around Hillary's ankles:

--Hillarycare debacle of the early 90's
--Hillary voted against General Petreaus, something many will never forget
--Moveon.org was originally set up for the Clintons to "move on" past Monicagate
--Hillary is identified with the anti-war left at a time when America is winning
--$5000 per child is essentially buying votes, something that only 3rd world leaders do
--Hillary is promising to bring government regulation into our economies largest sector: health care, at enormous cost to taxpayers, far more than anyone can imagine with Baby Boomers getting old and their demand for health care rising

I predict that she can never receive more than 45% of the popular vote no matter what she does. She will be solely responsible for putting a republican in the white house.

Things working against all democratic candidates for all offices:

--Treason is growing within the party. Democrats are openly waging war against America.
--The War on Terror is going very well, to the exclusive credit of Republicans. Democrats have fought so hard against it that none of them can take credit, not even a little.
--The economy is roaring, and this always works in favor of conservative candidates.
--North Korea is dismantaling its nuclear stuff, to the exclusive credit of Bush, after Clinton's embarrassing failure
--Russia, Iran, Venezuela, and other countries are sabor rattling, and the more national security becomes an issue, the more it works in the favor of the party known for being strong on national security: Republicans. Every time Putin flies a WW II bomber near another country, he insures 100,000 votes for the next conservative.

2007-10-16 03:44:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I think Giuliani will be nominated and if he's ahead in the polls, the election will be held and he'll be the next President. If he's not, then Bush will declare a "national catastrophe" and suspend the constitution under a presidential directive he's already issued.

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55824
http://progressive.org/mag_wx051807

2007-10-16 03:55:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Unfortunetly, the Bush adminstration will introduce a marshal law and impose that to every state/city in the country after a "terrorist attack", and continue his presidency for another term using this method as an excuse. NOTICED, America is changing?


WAKE UP.

2007-10-16 03:45:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There will be no election in '08

2007-10-16 05:47:27 · answer #6 · answered by nobodinoze 5 · 0 0

Clinton Obama

2007-10-16 03:38:41 · answer #7 · answered by San Diego Art Nut 6 · 1 2

Fred Thompson.

2007-10-16 03:38:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

whomever recieves the most electoral votes

2007-10-16 03:39:26 · answer #9 · answered by meightysix 3 · 0 0

I will win the whole world.

2007-10-16 03:38:38 · answer #10 · answered by Jack K 2 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers