English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-10-15 19:06:52 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

17 answers

ron paul

2007-10-15 19:12:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Hillary Clinton has the intelligence and experience as a Senator and former First Lady to make her the best Presidential candidate for 2008.

VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will likely win.

2007-10-16 03:32:22 · answer #2 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 2 0

The best candidate is the man who read the Pentagon Papers into the public record, revealing the long tale of lies and deceit that kept our soldiers in Viet Nam.
The man who ended the draft in the U.S.
The man who battled Nixon all the way to the Supreme Court, and won.
The man who pushed for the Alaska pipeline, to reduce the danger of oil tankers wrecking in the Arctic.
The man who will not get us into new immoral foreign invasions.
The man who will end the military and corporate occupation of Iraq.
The only candidate who wants to give the People the real power in our government.
The man who talks sense in the debates, even though the media's sheep baa baa baa their mindless laughter, and shove him to the side.
The man who sometimes seems angry at the direction the other candidates are trying to take us, because ANGER IS THE CORRECT RESPONSE to what is happening to America.

The best candidate is Mike Gravel.

If YOU were never drafted, you owe it to him to listen. Then decide whether to vote according to your own choice, or to vote for whomever the media pundits tell you to vote for. Do you have the guts to TRUST YOURSELF?

Mike Gravel: let the people decide.

2007-10-16 09:05:06 · answer #3 · answered by sagacity incarnate 2 · 0 0

Ron Paul

2007-10-16 03:20:14 · answer #4 · answered by snipeswife 2 · 1 0

John McCain puts the "candid" in Candidate. His immigration bill was a flop because the Dems wanted it to be. They obstructed a decent bill but he worked with them to at least get the ball rolling. As President he could be trusted. As a politician compromise is a commodity.
Compromise is the chess game of politics. Throw in a side order of mud slinging to confuse the facts and detract the media from whats really going on and sit back and watch the game of all games.

2007-10-16 06:00:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Rudy Giuliani.

The whole world is waiting for Rudy Giuliani to debate Hillary!

THEN .... Hillary "Lightening Rod" Clinton will have to actually
ANSWER questions!!!

1 - What did she do with her promise to "Re-Vitalize" Upstate New York State versus what Giuliani did for NYC!!
That question alone, will be devastating for her!

2 - Why does Hillary engage known-convicted Felons in her campaign as Advisers no less, i.e. Sandy Berger CONVICTED of stealing TOP SECRET documents, caught stuffing them in his pants no less, breaching National Security to cover her husbands failures to act on terrorist plots and apprehend men like Osama Bin Laden NO LESS.

Let's see how that plays versus Giuliani breaking the Back or organized crime in NYC AND cleaning up the mess his Liberal Democratic predecessors left him on all levels!

The American people will see exactly who she, is if they don't already.

Nevertheless, keep in mind, the beginning of the end of America as we know and love it will occur post haste if Hillary ever sits in the Oval office because it won't be her ... it will really be "George Soros"
the Far Left Wing Liberal/Socialist Billionaire and his MoveOn crowd!

2007-10-16 02:26:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate. The others want to deficate on the Constitution and give unlimited powers to the government.

The others also want to stay in Iraq, where we spend $300,000,000.oo per day to kill a sadly small number of only 15 bad guys per day (which isnt a war at all).

2007-10-16 02:14:42 · answer #7 · answered by vote_usa_first 7 · 2 2

Mother Hillary
its only fair, we had 2 Bush's in the white house, so we can have 2 Clinton's

2007-10-16 04:34:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

As the most important issue is the War, I think our troops might know better than anybody else and they have chosen Ron Paul, the anti-war Republican (he's so anti-war that he exposes the Democrats as being pro-war).

2007-10-16 02:56:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

i really dont think there is one this is a slim field of nit wits i like fred thompson on the repulicans side and non of the democrats impress me . plus freds wife is hot i mean hell if you cant have a great selection of canidates atleast pick the one with the wife you want to look at for atleast 4 yrs im joking and serious at the same time



please point out what true military memeber is anti war when it comes to iraq and delievering the freedom to ppl that deserve it , the left has forgotten this is a volenteer army we arent forced to sign up.

2007-10-16 02:12:37 · answer #10 · answered by djominous20 5 · 0 3

None of the above. But in a pinch I would take Ron Paul.

2007-10-16 02:10:45 · answer #11 · answered by empd 3 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers