Not no, but HECK NO. Hilary Clinton is a psycho lunatic.
It's not just our country but the entire WORLD that's headed for disaster if she's sworn into office.
God forbid. The Founding Fathers would hang her because Hilary believes that government should solve all our problems.
When the Founding Fathers first created this country, they wanted to give the decisions to the PEOPLE. Man, give those choices and the money back to the citizens.
2007-10-15 17:16:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
5⤋
Every politician elected, unelected or going to be elected in the United States would make them deathly ill, including, Clinton, Bush, McCain (Bush's lap-dog) and the other liar's wanting to help themselves to power, treasure and pleasure! The Founding Fathers would need airline barf-bag's, if they seen the state of this union, first-hand! Nothing will change until the moron's in this country realize there is no difference between George Bush and Hillary Clinton, as well as others. They play the soft-headed American's, for the fools they are! The wealthy of this nation and politician's laugh themselves to death with each other behind closed doors, then appear in public and act like they hate each other and one is good and the other evil! Bill Clinton and George Bush, Sr are best of friends....while Hillary and George W. Bush act as though they hate each other and their policies will destroy America if implemented There's a sucker born every minute, it's the American voting population! Politicians are all in it for each other and they leave the American's what the bird left on the wire. Why do you think they destroyed the Third Party candidate, who now cannot even get on the ballot in many states. That was the threat to what they have going for each other now. They just take turns being president!
2007-10-16 01:20:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think the Founding Fathers would agree that Hillary and the Democratic Party are the protectors of the Constitution. I think they would be abhorred at Bush's statement that the Constitution is“ just a goddamned piece of paper!”
2007-10-16 00:45:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by wyldfyr 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Jefferson was afraid of the common citizen. He did NOT believe in Democracy. He DID like states rights, however, as long as the decisions were made by informed (which leaves you out) individuals. His views raised quite a stir when he went ahead and made the Louisiana Purchase AGAINST his views that the Federal government should stay small. I think both Jefferson and Lincoln would LOVE Hillary's ideas...Abe might even invite her over to his Gettysburg address.
2007-10-16 00:38:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by charlie the 2na 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
Having thus in a few words, opened the merits of the case, I shall now proceed to the plan I have to propose, which is,
To create a national fund, out of which there shall be paid to every person, when arrived at the age of twenty-one years, the sum of fifteen pounds sterling, as a compensation in part, for the loss of his or her natural inheritance, by the introduction of the system of landed property:
And also, the sum of ten pounds per annum, during life, to every person now living, of the age of fifty years, and to all others as they shall arrive at that age.
I have already established the principle, namely, that the earth, in its natural uncultivated state was, and ever would have continued to be, the common property of the human race; that in that state, every person would have been born to property; and that the system of landed property, by its inseparable connection with cultivation, and with what is called civilized life, has absorbed the property of all those whom it dispossessed, without providing, as ought to have been done, an indemnification for that loss.
-Thomas Paine
Agrarian Justice
http://www.thomaspaine.org/Archives/agjst.html
what your type would call socialism!
2007-10-16 01:07:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by avail_skillz 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The founding fathers didn't appear to be particularly enamored with socialism. I guess that would account for the lack of a similar political theme throughout the first 200 years of our government.
Edit: The people with the thumbs down are ordinary idiots. What I wrote is historical fact. What a bunch of freaking cornholes.
2007-10-16 00:33:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Don't get me wrong, they created a very nice framework for us to work with, but I could care less what a tiny club of exclusively white males (many of which were slave owners) think about Hillary Clinton.
I know that will cost me the right to be eternally sodomized on the planet Brain Surgery, but so be it.
2007-10-16 00:37:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
How about would they agree with the idea of political parties? No. They didn't want political parties in this country because they were seen as counter-productive. So you have to also ask, what would they think of Republicans as well?
2007-10-16 00:35:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Every time one of them opens his (usually her) mouth, they turn over in their graves. Every time one of them actually says something, they start spinning like dervishes.
2007-10-16 00:43:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Richard S 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
They wouldn't agree with either party.
2007-10-16 00:33:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Chsel 3
·
3⤊
2⤋