English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071016/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/gates_iran

doesn’t it make more sense to worry about the countries that already have arsenals of nukes and have even used them to burn civilians of other countries?

and did they not tell us they knew where Iraq nukes were? if they lied then would they not lie now?.

2007-10-15 16:30:10 · 3 answers · asked by Z 1 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

"Yes, you should worry about US nukes."

so how come nobody is talking about them then????

2007-10-15 16:50:10 · update #1

"Next time it's 5000 degrees somewhere and you have the opportunity to count remaining nukes, guess who will be missing one."

thats a hypothetical situation, doesnt it make more sense to consider what has already happened as oppoed to what MIGHT happen?
if country A has used nukes and country B doesnt even have them, who is more of a danger? you are comparing the actual with the theoretical - it is a weird comparison.

2007-10-15 16:52:51 · update #2

"Thank God you're not an American."

being american or not is completely irrelevant to the question, but i see what you mean. (I am from the Cocos Islands, go now and celebrate).

2007-10-15 16:58:48 · update #3

3 answers

The world must be free of nuclear weapons to avoid self-destruction.

2007-10-15 16:39:33 · answer #1 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 0

Yes, you should worry about US nukes.

Iran is your friend. They would never lie to you.

Next time it's 5000 degrees somewhere and you have the opportunity to count remaining nukes, guess who will be missing one.

Thank God you're not an American.

2007-10-15 23:45:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes they did tell us where the Iraqi Nukes were, I heard Clinton and the Democrats tell me all thru the 90s.

2007-10-15 23:43:28 · answer #3 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers