Because after all, it's apparently within their power to keep Bush from loosing face from not winning those things which he didn't win.
2007-10-15 15:47:07 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
p.s. Any way the State of Florida is recounted from 2000, Gore wins. The Supreme Court stopped the recount. Republicans "caged" the vote, something they had been on probation for since the 80s. So, to say Bush won, would be to lie.
2007-10-15 15:58:06 · update #1
I like how ronald r is the one calling us illiterate. he used the word "libtard." very mature, ronald.
2007-10-15 15:57:56 · answer #1 · answered by just some chick 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
i trust you, because you're completely credible, & properly recommended. i have not yet heard of this, yet have not been preserving. i might want to assert that i'm appalled, yet no longer shocked. did not the U.S. also strip Gore of the individuals'S vote? i'm more suitable & more suitable confident that we stay in an anarchy. obviously, the perfect courtroom has no authority over the Nobel Peace Prize, yet at the same time as has "regulation"--nationwide or international, had something to do with this adminstration? Its manipulations & deceit REEK. regardless of if it were obtainable to dig deeply into them, we would die of the fumes. WHAT terrorist, or buddy of a terrorist has been offered the Nobel Peace Prize? so some distance, your solutions were irrational venting, & the perpetuation of lies. perchance that is too a lot to anticipate an wise reaction. IF any of those those who're so blatantly ignorant face the reality of WW3, they are going to be hiding less than rocks the position they belong. IF there are any thumbs down, i did not provide them; i do not droop to that factor. & I truly received't watch FOX for his or her convoluted "information." Please say there is been a mistake! i extremely do not opt for to pass to Canada, yet i won't be able to take a lot more suitable.
2016-10-21 05:56:22 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As usually another stupid question. Bush deserves the award far more than Gore. The presidents home in Crawford is a green home. Used very little energy and is well built. Gore's home used about 20 times the energy used by average people, he also flies around in a private jet and owns SUVs. Gore is a hypocrite using Global warming for political reasons. Too bad he didn't do something about it when he was VP.
2007-10-15 15:58:49 · answer #3 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
You have a fanciful memory there. Bush won the recounts bud. And it was Gore who tried to steal the election by being the ashhole he is by taking it to the courts. Gore's such a Loooser!
2007-10-15 16:00:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Good one!!!
Might be the best thing for the planet that Gore had his win taken from him, otherwise we wouldn't have all his efforts bringing light to the crisis that is Climate Change.
2007-10-15 15:52:54 · answer #5 · answered by davster 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
That is the most cynical thing I have ever heard. Makes me wish I had said it
2007-10-15 15:56:56 · answer #6 · answered by Experto Credo 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Are Dems still saying Bush stole the 2000 election? If it's taking them this long to understand the electoral process, how long do you think it will take for them to "understand" the terrorists?
2007-10-15 15:53:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Let Gore have his Prize and hang it on his empty wall.
2007-10-15 15:56:17 · answer #8 · answered by ♥ Mel 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yeah.... get over it. Bush won the election, twice.
Gore didn't win, no matter how many times liberals claim he did.
He can keep his scientifically unsupportable Nobel prize for Peace.... what a joke.
2007-10-15 15:50:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋
LOL. I guess it is a lot easier to think up stupid statements then actual thoughtful questions.
2007-10-15 15:51:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋