The Physics of 9/11 have never been dispelled? and they don't work in the governments favor?

Question

the official version never dealt with building 7 and neither did Popular mechanics which so many of you 'tin hat haters" love to quote... further the fact that there were explosions documented by both eyewitnesses, (police, firemen, EMT's, Journalists) and seismic scientists (Palisades and Stony brook) has been ignored... also the pulverized concrete along with the Molten steel still in the basements of the towers weeks and weeks later has never been discussed.
Less than 600k was spent on the investigation as opposed to the 40 mil that got dumped into Clintons Hummer...

you can say anything you like, and here on Yahoo it's all about ego, but what is wrong with asking for an explanation for the worst act of domestic terror the world has ever seen?

and how Anti-American should you consider yourself for not wanting to know the truth..

didn't Christ say that the truth would set you free?

http://physics911.net/

the first 5 answers or so completely ignore the questions, 9/11 myths is completely false in it's assertions.

Oh Ok.. so lets deal with popular Mechanics then, notice that what the seismologist says is that they make no connection between explosives and the collapse.... thats fine and they shouldn't as that is not there filed, however it says nothing about what caused the tremors??????

They show a shot of Building 7 with a "strange" anomaly on the front of the building.. however the actual video of the building falling shows this same spot and there is no "scoop"...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEuJimaumW4

Answer 1

If the truth sets you free, you are locked tightly in the dungeon of lies.

Answer 2

As for the twin towers, a telling fact is that the 2nd tower hit actually fell first, reason being was that the impact of the plane (which I saw very clearly on TV) was about 10 stories or so lower than the impact point on the first tower that was hit. The additional weight from the extra stories was enough to cause the building to collapse earlier. As for explosions, get a cutting torch, wear a long sleeve shirt and eye protection, light the torch and get a good flame going and hold it close to some concrete, the heat from the torch causes the trapped air in the concrete to expand causing it to pop and explode. Steel melts, gets weak and bends first also causing more concrete to give way.

Answer 3

====THE COLLAPSE OF WTC7===========
The fact that WTC7 collapsed even though it wasn’t hit by the planes is not surprising.

Even though they were NOT hit by the jets, numerous buildings over a wide area were hit by debris from the collapsing towers and they collapsed or had to be immediately demolished. This includes: The Marriott World Trade Center , 6 World Trade Center, 5 World Trade Center, 4 World Trade Center, and St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church (which wasn’t even in the WTC complex). The Deutsche Bank Building was also outside the WTC complex & was massively damaged, and was declared a total loss in 2004.

As for WTC 7:
According to NIST "On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom — approximately 10 stories — about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out." See http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=5#wtc7)

WTC7 was only 400 feet from WTC1. Since WTC1 is over 1300 feet tall, as they pealed away, the large perimeter columns from WTC1 struck WTC7 & many other buildings with terrific force due to their high starting position. Archival photos shows perimeter columns lying on the ground up to WTC7 (http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm )

In addition, WTC7 was built straddling a Con-Edison substation. This meant that its walls had to carry a tremendous amount of force and were vulnerable to impact. In addition, WT7 contained numerous fuel tanks for generators, some holding 6000 gallons of fuel, & this contributed to its destruction.

Finally, at least 6 fires started in WTC7, each of which was described as “large” but there was no water to fight them. The fires were left to burn because the building started to lean and firefighters decided it was too dangerous to enter.

Workers testified that the east side slumped, then collapsed, pulling the rest of the building with it.

====Concrete Pulverized? Not really==========
CLAIM: Because there was such a large dust cloud when the towers fell, this must mean that everything was “pulverized” by the bombs which brought down the towers.

REALITY: Whenever a building or stadium collapses, you get a large dust cloud, no matter what the cause. So the question becomes, was the dust cloud too big (suggesting that bombs went off) when WTC1&2 collapsed? Only an expert can tell you whether the dust cloud was more consistent with bombs than with collapse alone.

Fortunately, we have experts who have analyzed the collapse. Moreover, they published their findings for all to see in an article in the leading demolition journal, ImplosionWorld. They say the collapse did not look like a “controlled demolition.” See Point #1 in:

http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf
====Molten metal========
This was aluminum. No molten steel was found, nor is there a reputable source for this claim

For example NIST says “In no instance did NIST report that steel in the WTC towers melted due to the fires.” See point 7 at http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs...

==So called "explosions" were just puffs of dust, not explosions============

Puffs of air are seen **all the time** in demolitions and therefore they mean nothing.

This important fact ends any argument that the puffs “must be” caused by bombs.

Structural Engineer Jon Magnussen says it is fairly common phenomenon in building collapses. “You could actually have a collapse starting at the top of the building, and the air could come out of the bottom, going down the elevator shafts. It finds the path of least resistance.” (Pop Mechanics, “Debunking” p.45)

That the puffs don’t signify explosions was also stated in the leading journal on demolition, "Implosion World":
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

Answer 4

Instead of reading idiots, get the book from popular mechanics. Anyone who believes that nonsense you have should be judged unfit to vote or walk the streets without a handler.

Answer 5

Well mr. physicist, the part I don't get is that they fail to make the connection with Roswell N.M. where everyone know the plot originated. Release the UFO and bigfoot files and we can all know the truth!

Answer 6

SPIN as they may, traitor bush and the lemmings that scurry after him cannot explain why he did nothing and instead allowed terrorists to attack the USA and murder Americans.

Answer 7

I see four question marks but no real question. Nothing but false media hype.

Answer 8

I thought we were done with this psycho babble bs

Answer 9

stop smoking that stuff and get some fresh air

Answer 10

You can believe whatever you want. i know what happened.