English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

Dierdre, I want you to consider something. Try substituting the term "Masculinist Movenment" with Nazism or Racism in the context of your question, and see if it makes any sense to ask it. Please see my response to Flyinghorse's question, and you should understand what I am talking about. Do you really think Jews spent any time asking themselves "what are the goals of the nazi movement? Whose life would it improve?

Come on women, give me a break! This is nonsense. If by definition the aspirations of Masculinists are anti-feminist, there is no sound justification for considering their concerns. Concern yourself instead with those who seek the equality of all persons. Any one not seeking the equality of all persons, is fundamentally driven to the extinction of all persons who don't fit their definition of human.

So keep distracting yourselves with things that will only defeat your attempts at equality for all persons.

Shingoshi Dao

2007-10-15 13:49:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

that's a humorous element, I even have in no way met a "masculinist" outdoors of this talk board, and that i'm quickly coming to the thought that they seem to be a only textual content-based life type devoid of exact manifestation in any respect. organic ASCII. i've got met sexists, chauvinists, bigots, misogynists of each and every hue, haters, rights advocates, authoritarians and despots. yet i've got in no way met a masculinist. Is it a be conscious somebody invented in junior intense while asked what the "opposite of a feminist" is, and it by some skill caught? it relatively is not any longer in any dictionary. Is the masculinist flow what occurs while grotesque adult adult males devoid of hair, flopping manbreasts and huge swollen beer bellies circulate their arms over a keyboard? if so then i'm particular even relatively grotesque adult adult males may well be a piece of it too. textual content would not care in case you're amazing.

2016-10-07 00:00:29 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

If it is really about honestly looking at gender roles and how society is set up and organised because of them and is really interested in fighting sexism than it would improve All of our lives like feminism does.

If it is really just anti-feminism disguised as wanting Equal rights and fighting disadvantages to men than it will maybe benefit some men but not most people. And most of the men who will benefit will be the men making money from the masculinist movement and getting attention from it.

I don't think that most other men or women will benefit and I really think that our lives will be a little worse. I'm thinking of all the men who I care about and care about me in any way.

2007-10-15 11:48:43 · answer #3 · answered by ♥ ~Sigy the Arctic Kitty~♥ 7 · 6 1

I'm amazed by all the shaming from other women and the subsequent 'thumbs up' whenever this topic is broached. It speaks volumes about the attitudes of some people here - -i.e. malign satisfacation at all the injustices and inequalities men face.

Anyway, it's goals are to primarily achieve equality b/w men and women and to focus on the issues men face - i.e. the anti-male courtroom bias where they lose in divorce/family court, esp. custody , addressing boys' education (as they are struggling b/c all the focus is on girls), the lack of focus in men's health consequently leaing them to live 6 years less than women, etcetera.

Succinctly, as the first poster said, basically to clean up the mess that feminism made.

2007-10-15 15:46:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

To overcome the uterocentric bias of modern conventional wisdom, and to awaken a fully human discourse on human affairs. This doesn't mean the eradication of the contributions of the women's movement, but placing them in a rightfully equal place with authentically masculine conceptions of reality and personhood.

2007-10-15 11:34:06 · answer #5 · answered by G-zilla 4 · 1 3

The goals of the masculist movement are to achieve parity with women in areas where they don't have it. This usually means family law. I think masculism is a worthy cause as long as those involved in it don't attack feminists for everything, and are willing to work alongside them.

2007-10-15 11:30:52 · answer #6 · answered by Rio Madeira 7 · 9 2

Why give Berth a thumbs down? At least he's being honest.

2007-10-15 11:52:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

LOL. No one's. It is a movement of whining and ignorant overgrown babies, who still need their mommies to wiped off their hairy arses from time to time. LOL

2007-10-15 11:20:53 · answer #8 · answered by ms.sophisticate 7 · 7 7

Patriarchy.
Eradication of the corrupt "domestic abuse" laws.
Default father custody in cases of separation or divorce

Patriarchy will improve everyones lives.

Feminist swine have two sets of lips, and the wrong ones are always open.

The four pillars of feminism are abortion, witchcraft, lesbianism, and misandry.

Someday feminists will long for they day when they were chained to their kitchen sinks.

2007-10-15 11:24:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 14

It aims to clean up the mess feminism made. Guys all too often are cheated out of being in their children's lives, for example.

2007-10-15 11:16:20 · answer #10 · answered by Miss Priss 1 · 6 12

fedest.com, questions and answers