After last night, would you say that TNA is just as good as WWE, if not better?

Question

I'm not saying either way...just asking.

Answer 1

TNA can compete with WWE as they don't hold back, and they don't have to rely on a guy who walks with a stick shoved up his posterior who makes a fool of himself to bring them ratings. If you noticed, TNA has slowly risen up and is starting to become more watched and well known. They're planning a show in Canada soon showing just how far they've from taping 1 hour shows in Orlando all the time. While WWE has lost ratings and many people have become upset with the lack of effort on their part as they don't seem to try. They seem to focus on "Sports Entertainment," while TNA focuses on wrestling abilities. They rarely go into the four's anymore and last's week raw rating got them a 2.8. TNA if they make smart decisions like the knockout's division and not having backstage politics destroy it like what happened to WCW, TNA will be just as good if not better than WWE.

Answer 2

Better then most WWE episodes , but still not even (it's getting there) I like what they're doing with Curt and the matches where better then anything Raw has had in a while (I'm not talking main event) but TNA needs a second show latter in the week and an even focus on the older wrestlers and the young up and comers . I also think A.J. needs to brake away from Christian and be independent again . Lastly , they need to do shows on the road .

Answer 3

As of Now I would say that TNA is Way better then WWE, But I still watch ALL TNA & WWE shows each and every week.

Answer 4

TNA is just as good as WWE.

I was last night at Bound for Glory and I can say with all due WWE respect, that TNA is getting better and better, no doubt about it.

This is for Crude:
Look man, you have been saying throughtout the day, that BfG sucks hell, so man...please, Shut Up!
U don't even know what the hell are you talking about.
I was at Bound for Glory, and was a hell of a show.

If u don't like...I don't give a Damn!

Answer 5

TNA sucks they like wcw make exciting of wwe and wwe consistently been the the excellent wrestling teach all time plus they have old wwe superstars so tna sucks and street dogg and mr. asss billy gun wasn't dx hbk and triple h rick rude and chyna start up dx and bret the hit guy hart is decrease back and with a bit of luck he might hlep wwe persistently and wreck tna for sturdy.

Answer 6

Nope. TNA still sucks the ball...it just shows that they have the potential to do good. As I said, way too tremendously overbooked to the point where it became a cluster**** at times. You can't book your PPVs to feature everybody on the roster so that everyone is happy, you book the biggest draws, and although the "same twelve guys on a PPV" thing WWE has going on is stupid, it's better than what TNA does with its nineteen zillion gimmick matches in one night.

Answer 7

You're not saying? You are saying TNA is better or else you wouldn't have asked this. 3 hours of No Mercy or Bound For Glory where you actually had a wrestling show. If you like Hunter Has Herpes 24/7 watch RAW which shows HHH is hurting it's ratings. TNA is schooling We Were Entertaining to the point where Vince McMahon is watching TNA now.

Answer 8

Let's see if they're smart enough to end the uber-pushes for Kurt Angle and Pacman Jones first.

If so, then TNA's got the same product they had in 2005, and will then be able to compete with the WWE.

Answer 9

I didn't watch it, so I cannot say. Can't wait to see Mr. TNA's unbiased opinion on this question.

Answer 10

not even close, no offense to those tna lovers, but that stuff is like middle school wrestling, its boooooring.