I sure hope she's looking into how Canada and Australia have their system set up. Those systems look like a winner to me.
2007-10-15 10:50:20 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Senior Citizens
I agree with you RB. Good idea! One proposal is to have the option of choosing a plan much like members of Congress. We'll see.
2007-10-15 11:18:38 · update #1
I will not vote for HIllary, but it does not matter. All of the candidates can say what ever they want. But implementing it is another thing. It is an uphill battle, They can not just pull out their magic wand and make it happen. They have to fight, Congress and everybody else to make it happen, and from what I have seen in the past,it's going to be a long hard road for anyone who is elected.
Australia, and Canada's systems do not work as well as everybody thinks. I have heard a lot of stories about the many problems. People just need to set priorities and get something done, or we are all going to be in a lot more trouble, than we are already
2007-10-16 07:43:28 · answer #1 · answered by Moe 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Your wages will be garnished or you will face a steep penalty.. but that's all she will say on the matter. She will not say how much or what that penalty might be.. and she has been asked several times. She also doesn't know how she will get everyone who is employed to sign up. Now, for those who are unemployed and living off the government dime ( FEMA) or the illegals, they don't have to worry. They'll be covered, too. France has the best health care in the world. They also have a 52% tax base. This plan will not be nearly as good and will cost more.
2016-04-08 23:31:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Her plan consists of landing in the
White House. Health insurance will be a ho hum issue once she becomes the Madam of the Land. I vividly recall her mouth running for at least 9 years about health care---if their lips move---watch out. I have no respect for anyone that would swallow their own pride and respect for a position.
That is exactly what she did when Bill got caught. He was lame and she is worse. I hate politics but I do feel that she is a master at deception and a fund raiser of renown--it all seems to be funds now and not expertise. I will vote for a toad before I vote for her.
2007-10-15 23:47:54 · answer #3 · answered by lilabner 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I am not sure of all the details---but I do remember there
was a provision for a government subsidy for the
poorest ones in the nation who were not able to meet
the requirement for Universal Membership .
I am sure she has good advisors who will look into
any successful plans in existence ! We can be sure
of one thing ---if these plans are only "partially
successful " they are way ahead of us !
Based on her earlier failure she will surely omit
some of the items that the Nation was not ready
to accept ---
and we can be sure also that it will be a start and
finally we have someone with a DESIRE to
achieve ---and not frustrate---attempts to give us
this long delayed right of every citizen ---not
just the Rich !
Remember --"Where there's a will ---there's a way !
2007-10-15 11:17:21 · answer #4 · answered by ytellu 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I believe whatever it is congress needs to be on it too. They should have the same plan. I believe that all in the political offices (National) ones should be on the plan first. Then let's see how many of them are still alive after one year! If the majority are, then I think it is a GO !!
2007-10-15 10:56:19 · answer #5 · answered by RB 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Her first health care plan was a disaster. You can bet whatever she might choose will raise our taxes through the roof. I hope we get lucky and someone (almost anyone) beats her if she's the candidate.
2007-10-15 18:54:13 · answer #6 · answered by missingora 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
She had 8 years in the White House to sort it out, and she did not. How long do you need? The Australian system is failing because of lack of good doctors and shortage of nurses. I wish her luck, But hey. She is not in yet. She can say all she likes, and make it sound appealing to the voters, implementing it, and seeing it through to it's conclusions, is a different matter.
2007-10-15 11:00:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I have really been wondering
about this myself. She was
all hot about her health plan but doesn't give us any specifics. I'm wondering if she really has them? Also, lately she is bogged down in the Iraq subject and hasn't really said anything exciting, at least not exciting to me.
2007-10-15 15:11:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm just waiting to read who does know....I'm all for something better that helps all of us, yet am also mystified as to what her plan entails and how it will work
2007-10-15 23:23:19 · answer #9 · answered by sage seeker 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i think all of the politicians should have to have the stupid medicare part D donut l hole experience like i'm going through.
2007-10-15 12:22:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋