why is it that for every one thing wrong with communism there are a thousand things wrong with capitalism?

Question

capitalism is reponsible wholy for global warming, e.g keep taking the earth natural resources for prophit unlike in communism which is only take what is nessesary which makes sense in protecting our environment. if you look at all the rain forests that hve been and are being chopped down, all the timber from it went to capitalist countires, e.g brazilian hardwood to u.s and western europe. if you add all the mineral resourses being mined for the u.s to keeps it's greedy industires working,well no need to look further in who the bggest environmental destroyers are.the u.s blames new upcomeng indusrial countires like india and china but yet these countires hve only been indstiral powers in the last 10 years unlike the u.s and western europe which has been causeing global warming since the age of the idutrial revolution.there are thousands of other reasons why capitalism is evil bt it's too much to put in a small forum, but people do understand my main points

Answer 1

I hope you are kidding?. Yes, China and Russia have always held the environment in high regard. LOL

Answer 2

You are neglecting to look at what capitalism has brought the world. The advances in science, technology, and medicine has been outstanding. Communism tried to keep up with the advances that capitalism was able to make but just could not keep up. The space race for instance. In fact, the computer that you are using to type your message is available to you because of capitalism. Communism would not care if you had a computer for your own personal use. In fact, it is not in communism's best interest to let you have a computer for your own personal use.

Also, communism is responsible for some major environmental problems. Remember Chernobyl. The Soviet Union had many problems with its nuclear subs as well that have resulted in radiation leaked into the environment. The problem. Communism just did not have the resources or motivation to properly build and run nuclear reactors. The Soviet Union had the resources as a whole, but those resources were squandered trying to maintain the illusion that communism was the way to run a country. Meanwhile, the US (while having some nuclear difficulties of its own but never having anything as major as the Soviet's disasters), built more solid and dependable nuclear reactors. We properly used our resources because capitalism demanded it. The resources in capitalism had to be used for their maximum economic impact rather than to make sure that all of the citizens were equally cared for.

Answer 3

those who do no longer study from historic previous are doomed to repeat it. Ask any Russian how large communism become. Stalin become an excellent communist chief who lived in luxury at the same time as something of teh usa had hassle searching nutrition. obviously the a number of "purges" of undesirable voters that occurs contained in the soviet union also communicate volumes of ways large a gadget it really is to stay less than. and look on the finished accomplishments of each and every of the governments which have said the socialist variety. The thousands and thousands of intellectuals, educators, and different udesirables that were executed, the poverty and degredation that the problem-free citizen is left to stay in all communicate properly for this style of unsuitable gadget. obviously you arent taxed in those coutries, because you dont personal something to tax. the authorities owns each and every of the resources and money and allow you to to artwork for subsistance wages. What an excellent way of existence! In any gadget there are skill hungry indifiduals and persons who will administration the gadget for his or her very personal benefit. the finished element about living less than a capitolist gadget is that you've the flexibility to make regardless of existence you opt for for your self. You dont have the authorities telling you what interest you may have in existence as they do in comunist coutries. Yao Ming (chinese baskeball participant) become the fabricated from a authorities ordered marriage and at the same time as they said his length he become compelled to grow to be a baskeball participant. although, if he had no longer been so large, he would have ended up planting rice with out different concepts in his existence. sense free you stay less than the gadget you do. you've an excellent style of opportinities that human beings contained in the international might want to kill to have.

Answer 4

Both communism and capitalism mean oppression, whether it be from some multimillionaire business influencing politics, to a corrupt dictatorship.

I choose libertarian socialism. People need as much freedom from government as possible, without a market that plays into the hands of the elite and wealthy. That is the only logical way people can be free.

Answer 5

A conclusion obviously drawn by a Communist, with no independent thought or research on the subject. Talking to a brick would make better sense than to try to discuss an answer with such an ideologue as you.

Answer 6

what would be wrong with a system that makes every one happy? we go with the flow until enough people say no, when some times it should be enough for a few people to employ the right system , but are the minority in thinking wrong every time? good ideas are not just thrown away because they are no good; it is more of the case, it wont make us any money .

Answer 7

Well if your writing was comprehensible, I might have agreed. But, from what I made out of your "English" was that Communism is a good thing for the environment. But I think that private business, and private citizens owning their own land will be more conscience of the environment than communist governments who control everything without regard for their citizens and environment.

Answer 8

Did you know that the most polluted lake in the World is located in Russia which use to be Communist.

Communism is more hazardous to the environment than Capitalism.

Answer 9

there is a saying: 'if you establish communism in Sahara, there will be not enough sand in 1 week'

an this is bloody damn true...

communism regimes poisoned large areas of the globe, look at Middle Asian post-soviet states, look at Tschernobyl... only because the censorship was so strict you, people of the West world do not know anything about it...

Answer 10

please be advised.
your history is considerably flawed, your conclusions are most flawed and your dream of an Eco friendly commie world is a nightmare.

you should look closely at the old soviet unions ecological disasters they caused in the past and the ones still going on now

try to imagine such bad management that 2 lakes have diapered one is diapering and best of all right in the middle of it is a nuclear waist disposal area that will be exposed to the environment soon enough thanks to your wonderful Communists

Answer 11

did you miss out on the former soviet union raping the land to build their empire?

Had they had a more sucessful ecomomy they would have done more damage.

You forget to mention that the capitalist countries are the only ones repenishing what they take with programs like reforestation.

Yes Cuba is only doing what is neccesary to survice like growing tobacco fields. We all know the body cant survive without cigar tabacco smoke being ingested.