In a war between USA and UK, who would win?

Question

I think that the United States would win, although it would be one hell of a fight due to the Geography of the two countries. Who do you think would win?

Answer 1

The United States, their military is larger, more advanced, and most importantly, has better extension of force. Extension of force is the ability of an army to to strike its foe. Our navy and airforce would be able to gain control of the atlantic and start pounding and blockading Britain. Furthermore, even if the British managed to gain control of the Atlantic, the United States is so large and dispersed that they won't be able to attack all of the military, political, and economic targets they would need to hit to cripple America's war effort, Britain meanwhile is so small that we would be able to inflict severe damage on their resources and infrastructure. Such a war would mostly be naval and air battles in the east Atlantic and over and around Britain. We probaly wouldn't actually attempt a landing on the British mainland because that would be incredibly costly, however, we would still be able to destroy all of their capability for fighting outside of the British Isles.
This assumes that neither side would use nuclear weapons.


PS To the Texan:
I like your mentality, but your forgeting the midwest. I'm from Minnesota, and pretty much everyone I know goes hunting. One of my friends owns several dozen guns, and goes through several thousand rounds a week (granted that's his entire family's bullet consumption) Most of my friends and I think he's insane, but he still loves guns. Furthermore, on deer hunting opener about 1/3 of the people in one of my classes skipped school. So, yes the south is incredibly pro-gun and has a right to brag, but don't forget the rest of us, the midwest is pretty uncoquerable too. By the way, I'm guessing that anyone from Europe or one of the more liberal states will think that we are all insane future serial killers when they read this. Don't worry, we're generaly law-abiding.

Answer 2

It's actually a 1-1 score. The War of 1812 was a British victory, since the Americans declared war, and their main goal was to take over Canada. How well did that work out?

Answer 3

relies upon if there have been allies or no longer. with out allies the U. S. easily. guy for guy the British military is plenty greater useful knowledgeable no longer because of the fact "Brits are greater experienced and better than yanks"(bullshit) yet because of the fact we've a plenty smaller military. once you have a small tension you're able to coach your troops greater useful in case you prefer to maintain up with something of the international. although the U. S. basically has an overpowering quantity of air and naval power. they could lose many men and that i doubt that they might occupy the British Isles for long yet they could finally deliver us lower back to the darkish a while. With allies the U. S. could maximum in all danger lose. Britain has the entire commonwealth which might lower back her up and many Europe might connect (an alliance between uk, France and Germany could be sufficient to examine Americas power). additionally regardless of no longer liking Britain in any way there's a intense danger that Russia and according to danger China could connect out of a shared dislike of usa of america. between Britain, Europe, Russia, China and the commonwealth usa of america could be vastly overwhelmed the two militarily and economically and could be destroyed. it rather is although hypothesis. this is accessible that not one of the international places different than for the commonwealth could connect (we're not the main time-honored usa) which might effect lower back in Britain's defeat. of direction it rather is by no potential going to ensue as uk-u . s . are allies and mutually are unstoppable! :D EDIT- very stable factors Liam although i could disagree on the civilian gun possession. at the same time as formally there are rarely any weapons interior the united kingdom there are 1000's of 1000's going around on the black industry. I lived in London for some years and the situation became into actually crawling with them. they're even commencing as much as seem in my place of birth of Aberdeen, Scotland on a in many cases occurring foundation which became into mind-blowing 5 years in the past.

Answer 4

It would never be a fight between the UK and the US

The Commonwealth would be at war for the mother country again

And it is a big Commonwealth

Answer 5

The current record stands at USA - 2, UK - 0. So, if the USA actually declared war via a Congressional vote, then the fight would last about 1 hour with the USA, again, kicking butt.

Answer 6

It would be far easier to occupy the UK than it would be to occupy the US. Just land mass in consideration. I would assume we're not talking about Canada and Australia and anyone else who considers themselves independent countries...

Answer 7

lets put it this way

If the UK was no longer allied with the US ... half the world would line up to fight the UK, you have allot more history than us ... and that says quite a bit

Answer 8

I hope you're kidding. The US could just use the material we already have in Britain.

The United States spends more on our military than the rest of the world combined. $2.1 TRILLION in five years.

Answer 9

Let's see:U.S. 270,000,000 people,300,000,000 weapons.Come on over Slick.I'd steer clear of the South,we tend to be less than forgiving to those who wish us harm,and we can shoot straight,having stayed away from the liberal North and being used to firearms.

Answer 10

Middle East will win !!??