Do you agree with Dr. Roth about the new mental disorder, Gutless Syndrome?

Question

It affects mostly liberal politicians and judges.

WE HAVE A NEW SYNDROME, TYPE 1, GUTLESS
By Dr. Laurie Roth Ph.D. October 12, 2007
http://www.newswithviews.com/Roth/laurie81.htm

There seems to be no end to the hallucinogenic influences of our "sensitivity" issues regarding those who break the law and try to kill us. Because this set of responses and behaviors of over sensitivity can be seen literally everywhere, i.e. congress, court rooms, judges, jails and schools, I am going to join the sensitive and misguided bandwagon and create another
mental health syndrome to describe this. After all, my Ph.D. is in counseling. I will call this national obsession……Type 1, GUTLESS Syndrome (Guilty, Universal, Tripping, Love, Endless Sensitivity Syndrome).

No, corach. These liberal, activist judges are not ruling on the merits of the laws, but substituting their own preferences for the laws. Specifically, the idiot judge who stopped the federal govt from checking the social security numbers of employees. That gutless wonder stopped the federal govt from enforcing the law. That kind of unlawful judicial interference from liberal, activist jdges has to stop!

Answer 1

I think you'ver got something there and the USA is suffering from it

Answer 2

No -- she seems to be among the many supposedly educated people who cannot understand the basic distinction between following constitutional requirements and doing something that is voluntary.

What the judge in the article did is a constitutional requirement based on the wording and structure of the law in question -- and it was only a preliminary injunction until the other appropriate laws and rules that were pending went into effect. In other words, Roth completely fails to understand the legal issues, and simply attacks what she doesn't like.

Ramos and Campeon were convicted of violating federal weapons laws -- not for doing their job. The fact that they were doing their job did not give them an excuse to violate those federal weapon laws, as a conservative Judge, conservative Appellate Court, conservative Congress, and Bush all acknowledged. Again Roth completely fails to understand the legal issues, and simply attacks what she doesn't like.

Then there are her arguments about things being done "in a time of war" -- when no war has been declared by Congress. So, if this counts as a time of war, any other time in the future could just as easily be considered a time of war if the media wants it to be -- meaning the legal and constitutional concepts of "time of war" has just been thrown out the window.

But, that seems to be her recurrent theme -- throw out any law or constitutional requirement she doesn't like -- because actually obeying the law when she doesn't like the result is "GUTLESS".

Answer 3

Busch is not considered a Liberal and yet he would not allow an illegal alien to be executed in Texas for the deaths of two teenage girls....hmmmmmm.....or is this just the full of **** syndrome

Answer 4

Too many syndromes already. This is just another way for big pharma to make a pill to treat a phony condition.

Answer 5

Yes

Answer 6

Cute, take a bunch of legal decisions that you disagree with and call it a syndrome. Question is, what are we going to do about conservative douchebag pundit syndrome?

Answer 7

I think it's an editorial. There were no studies used to demonstrate its validity.

Answer 8

phd ???
My a**